No. But they sure don't need to put them on the bench and in his administration like Romney did, or give them free rein to infect the schools with their extreme propaganda, or name two gay men "Parents of the Year," or force the justices of the peace to "marry" them, etc., etc., etc.
Please explain how the following is of such interest to you and MassResistance:
I think it's important that in any discussion related to marriage that we should reiterate time and again our view that individuals in our society should be able to make the choices they want in their lives, and that we have respect for people's choices. We have a high degree of respect and tolerance for people whose lifestyle and choices and orientation is as they may choose.
How does that make him pro-radical gay agenda?