To: GodGunsGuts
"More on the motivations and conclusions of the Darwinist faithful:"
You seem to be trying to make an
Appeal to consequences. Normally that would be frowned on as a valid argument but it seems to be the height of what passes for debate around here. So a quick question.
Assume for a second that the universe is "pointless" and there is no "meaning of life". Would you rather accept the truth or live in a delusion?
51 posted on
07/14/2007 12:04:30 PM PDT by
ndt
To: ndt
Assume for a second that the universe is “pointless” and there is no “meaning of life”. Would you rather accept the truth or live in a delusion?
That would be impossible. The truth has a point. If the universe is pointless and “has no meaning”, then you couldn’t trust your own conclusion about anything.
To: ndt
Assume for a second that the universe is "pointless" and there is no "meaning of life". Would you rather accept the truth or live in a delusion?Why should we care if there is a "meaning of life"? I'm not being rhetorical, I'm really asking.
286 posted on
07/15/2007 3:27:22 AM PDT by
AndyTheBear
(Disastrous social experimentation is the opiate of elitist snobs.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson