Replies

We lose, as usual, out-of-the-gate in this debate---as it has already been 'won' by those who have NAMED THE TERMS!

Orwellian name for this unfair doctrine?...Why it's "THE Fairness Doctrine!" Of course!

In fact, it's "BRING BACK THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE!"

Bring things back to where they were before? Why that's original intent! That's conservative, anti-progressive thought! We should all be pleased!

This reminds me of how we lost the term "RED STATE" as a bad name for Commies....or even that commies are bad (see Sicko/Cuba).

Those who tagged the previous debate as "AMNESTY" instead of "Immigration Reform" won that debate.

If we don't own the language here, then we don't win the debate. Dims know this.

If we don't own the language here, then we don't win the debate.

Relax. Dims are cutting their own throats by even flirting with this ridiculous initiative. They are making parodies of themselves. They have absolutely no chance whatsoever of laying a glove on Rush, even if they control all branches of government. In the process of trying they are doing wonders to motivate the conservative base and paint themselves as wannabe tyrants. Stupid.