Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Pakistan’s nuclear crown jewels safe in military’s custody’
Daily Times ^ | Tuesday, July 17, 2007 | Khalid Hasan

Posted on 07/16/2007 4:40:29 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

WASHINGTON: A Pakistani nuclear safety expert has claimed that the country’s “nuclear crown jewels” are safe in the hands of the army and cannot fall under the control of extremists or terrorists.

According to Lt Col Zafar Ali of Pakistan’s Strategic Plans Division, who spent four months at the Stimson Centre as a visiting fellow, if the “ Chinese government could maintain control of its nuclear weapons during the Cultural Revolution, Pakistan’s military can also maintain close watch and control over its nuclear crown jewels … The odds are still heavily in favour of the military maintaining strict command and control.”

In a paper Col Ali wrote at the conclusion of his assignment, he said Pakistan has a well structured command and control system and its export control law on sensitive material and technology is aligned with international standards and the non-proliferation regime.

He writes that the induction of new and sophisticated weapons in South Asia is destabilising as it could initiate an arms race. It is in Pakistan’s interest to reduce asymmetry in conventional forces to keep the nuclear threshold high. He calls the US-India civil nuclear deal an unhelpful development, since it creates an exception to non-proliferation rules and norms based on one country, rather than on specific criteria or energy needs.

Col Ali notes that over the past couple of years there has been a renewed emphasis by Washington and some Western countries that nuclear weapons and materials in South Asia especially in Pakistan are vulnerable to terrorists’ or extremists’ control – “a seemingly deliberate effort to undermine the credibility of Pakistan’s command and control”. He admits that like any other country, Pakistan also faces terrorist threats from non-state actors or extremist groups operating in the region and beyond; however, the dangers to nuclear assets and materials are not as grave as perceived in the West.

Col Ali agrees that media reports on Dr AQ Khan’s non-state network raised lingering suspicions, as a consequence overshadowing Pakistan’s efforts to harness a coherent command and control system. The security environment of the region and the innate opacity and lack of information about the Pakistani nuclear programme further provoke worries. Although Pakistan has put in place effective remedies to prevent the recurrence of past malpractice, no nation can be satisfied as improvement is a continuous phenomenon.

“The question arises as to why Pakistan is regarded as suspect. There are three reasons: firstly, the legacy of AQ Khan’s proliferation network; secondly, Pakistan’s proximity to the region where Al Qaeda and Taliban remnants are located; and thirdly because of religious conservatism in Pakistani society. Pakistan’s nuclear assets are under custodial control and weak links in management and oversight have been addressed to prevent the recurrence of any proliferation activity. While Al Qaeda and the Taliban have no direct bearing on Pakistan’s nuclear assets, the threat from their affiliates and extremist groups is genuinely worrisome. Nevertheless, instances of illicit trafficking of nuclear material and loss of control over nuclear assets in other countries should not be made a basis to raise suspicions over Pakistan’s nuclear assets.”


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: nukes; pakistan

1 posted on 07/16/2007 4:40:32 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SandRat; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; blam; SunkenCiv; Marine_Uncle; Allegra; onyx; ...

Thought this might be of interest...


2 posted on 07/16/2007 4:41:40 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (NO BURQAS FOR MY GRANDAUGHTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
...The odds are still heavily in favour of the military maintaining strict command and control.

When nukes are concerned, that's not a terribly reassuring sentiment.

3 posted on 07/16/2007 4:42:38 PM PDT by lesser_satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith

Interesting timing..


4 posted on 07/16/2007 4:43:49 PM PDT by Dog ("Nothing important happened today." - from the diary of England’s King George III, July 4, 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Considering Dr AQ Khan’s non-state network, it is difficult to believe that Pakistan harness’s a coherent command and control system.


5 posted on 07/16/2007 4:54:18 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

6 posted on 07/16/2007 4:55:42 PM PDT by Gritty (The End of The World As We Know It begins with an "I" and ends with a "slam." - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I would feel better if Dr. AQ Khan was in US custody rather than under Pakistani house arrest.


7 posted on 07/16/2007 4:58:31 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lesser_satan

Depends if Paki military men value Paki population centers.


8 posted on 07/16/2007 5:07:14 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dog

yup


9 posted on 07/16/2007 6:25:27 PM PDT by expatguy (Support - "An American Expat in Southeast Asia")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Absolutely nobody in the Pak military has any AQ sympathies or leanings?


10 posted on 07/16/2007 6:29:13 PM PDT by Fitzcarraldo (Skip the Moon, go for Mars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"Nevertheless, instances of illicit trafficking of nuclear material and loss of control over nuclear assets in other countries should not be made a basis to raise suspicions over Pakistan’s nuclear assets.”

That's exactly why everyone should be suspicious.

11 posted on 07/16/2007 6:36:30 PM PDT by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"Nevertheless, instances of illicit trafficking of nuclear material and loss of control over nuclear assets in other countries should not be made a basis to raise suspicions over Pakistan’s nuclear assets.”

That's exactly why everyone should be suspicious.

12 posted on 07/16/2007 6:36:38 PM PDT by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Hopefully there are not crazy islamic terrorists in the upper echelon of the Pakistani Army.
13 posted on 07/16/2007 6:50:25 PM PDT by jveritas (God bless our brave troops and President Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Trusting Pakistan’s military with nuclear weapons is like trusting Bill Clinton to give your college age daughter a job as an intern.


14 posted on 07/16/2007 7:48:38 PM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Are you being sarcastic? You should look up on Pak intel services and higher ups and how they do things... taliban , “northern light brigade”, Laiksh-e-Toaiba. These guys arent our friends.


15 posted on 07/17/2007 3:24:47 PM PDT by Eyes Unclouded (We won't ever free our guns but be sure we'll let them triggers go....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

It’s not only Pakistan that bothers me. The ex-Soviet block countries as well as Russia have to damn much stuff poorly guarded sitting around. If we remember, the US was giving quite a few hundred million to Russia to help rid it of a lot of it’s Plutonium and Uranium. Crime families and radical groups throughout the Asian continent surely have their eyes on making purchases, then selling to the hightest bidders in the Islamic world.


16 posted on 07/17/2007 4:31:09 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Hunter in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson