Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Very long article. Way too much hubris to mention it all. Read it yourselves.
1 posted on 07/17/2007 12:20:15 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Lorianne

Man that is one long article that basically comes down to this:

GIMME GIMME GIMME GIMME GIMME.....Wheres the money!!!
I’m a victim of social injustice!


2 posted on 07/17/2007 1:06:25 AM PDT by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
And if the government simply refused to rebuild or renovate this public housing — what would happen then?

A media frenzy, followed by riots, repercussions, and perhaps even revolution.

Back in the 1930s the federal government came to the conclusion that there existed a certain percentage of the population who were simply incapable of taking care of themselves. The unworkable free-market capitalist system had reached its inevitable breaking point; Depression had put thousands of these people on the streets, and the potential for communist revolution was very real. Knowing full well that communism was an unworkable alternative, and that any move in that direction by the rabble would kill any chance of reviving the dead capitalist goose, alternatives were considered. At that time, the decision was made to adopt a system of quasi-socialistic “welfare” under which the federal government would become the employer, insurer, and/or caretaker of last resort for those who simply could not make their own way in the world. Social Security was the first of these programs, designed to care for those incapable of saving for their own retirement. More, much more, was to come: federal highways, giant bomber programs, food stamps, college financial aid, oil depletion allowances, agriculture subsidies, dams, electrification, the space program, and more.

This strategy largely succeeded, in that it prevented the collapse of the capitalist system long enough for middle-class welfare programs (e.g. World War II military spending) to pump enough cash into the system to revive it. Of course these “new deal” programs didn’t fix the problem; the problem was that boom-and-bust cycles were endemic to and inseparable from free-market capitalism. Without the welfare state providing jobs, money, housing, and other benefits, we would quite likely have seen the rise of a real communist movement in the United States during the late 1930s. Ironically, the “socialist” New Deal and its successor programs were instrumental in preventing a “Red Deal” from coming to fruition. By propping up the corpse of capitalism with government welfare cash, FDR became the savior of American capitalism.

Unfortunately, these welfare programs created a permanent underclass in America — a constituency of voters with no marketable skills, no capital for investments, no culture of ambition, and no love for the society that “kept them down”. Generation followed generation in dependence to the federal dollar, eventually breeding the super-dependent urban poor of today. Add to this the hordes of aged, working-class retirees, many of whom spent their whole lives building fighter jets and aircraft carriers for companies supported by massive federal programs and are now utterly convinced that they are “owed” are free ride on the taxpayer dime (and damn the consequences) and the size of the permanent underclass becomes prodigious.

So what is to be done? The sad fact is that the class of people incapable of taking care of themselves has only grown larger. The bottom line is that so many people (both poor and not so poor) are receiving checks from the federal government that it is politically impossible to stanch the flow of government entitlements. Any politician advocating cuts in Housing For The Poor or the elimination of XM-67 Willliam Calley Rapid-Fire Village Decimation System is going to end up looking for work himself once the voters in his/her district find out. Add to this a media culture in which the idea of victimhood is equated with saintliness and the problem becomes more intractable.

At the current time, the government check is simply too integral to the economy to be removed entirely; and, since everyone who gets a government check is convinced that they truly deserve it, any effort to eliminate payments to the “undeserving” will fail. If the billions of dollars given to people in the form of cash, retirement benefits, bloated procurement programs, state park and highway funds, disability payments, low-cost housing, free medical care, and other forms of financial aid were ever to be significantly decreased or cut off, the Red Revolution we avoided in the 1930s would suddenly become a real threat again.

Ask yourself the following question: How many people do I know that receive a check or other benefit from the federal government on a regular basis?” Odds are you know several such people; you may even receive a government benefit yourself.

Then ask yourself what would happen if those checks stopped coming...

No President, no Congress is or will ever be willing to destroy the welfare state. The welfare state IS the state; without it, the state ceases to exist. All we are left with is the knowledge that Something cannot be made out of Nothing forever; someday, the whole rotten system will collapse on its own. Then, and only then, will a chance exist to destroy the welfare state.

3 posted on 07/17/2007 2:07:03 AM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
I’m a Katrina evacuee (not victim) from Biloxi, Mississippi, who now lives in Fort Worth. When I went to FEMA, both in Biloxi and here, they subtly but plainly let me know that white people can’t be Katrina “victims” so I was on my own. For awhile, I was in charge of one of the workforce offices in Dallas that worked with NOLA evacuees, but never received assistance myself. If “Bush hates black people” he sure has a funny way of showing it. We were giving away: Target & Wal-Mart gift cards, laptop computers with Wi-Fi, food stamps, unemployment assistance, housing, TANF (welfare money), clothing, gasoline debit cards, bus passes, career counseling, etc.. We offered to bus them to huge job fairs, but there were few takers.
4 posted on 07/17/2007 2:41:58 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Indianhead Division: Second To None!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

I had to read only as far as “sitting on a milk crate watching TV” to understand the where this piece was going.

We gotta have the TV, even before there is milk in the fridge.


5 posted on 07/17/2007 5:15:38 AM PDT by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
a public housing unit inherited from Jocquelyn’s mother

I learned some property law. I didn't know public housing units could be bequeathed to heirs. Can they be sold to third parties as well? Subleased?

9 posted on 07/17/2007 7:05:05 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
On a chilly autumn night, Jocquelyn Marshall opened the door to her new home, an apartment tucked in a maze of quiet streets lined with townhouses south of downtown New Orleans.

When I lived in New Orleans, the only thing south of downtown was the Mississippi River. I wonder where this is?

12 posted on 07/17/2007 10:37:21 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Withhold Taxes - Starve a Liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson