Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur

if i assumed that you follow evo because of the #s and I am wrong, then my apologies to you

but you are not clear as you are stil evading the question. why do you expect others to be impressed by the # of scientists believing in evolution when you yourself are (rightfully) not impressed by the majority of scientists who support man made climate change?


107 posted on 07/18/2007 1:58:14 PM PDT by FoolNoMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: FoolNoMore
but you are not clear as you are stil evading the question. why do you expect others to be impressed by the # of scientists believing in evolution when you yourself are (rightfully) not impressed by the majority of scientists who support man made climate change?

I'm not evading the question, you're drawing conclusions where there is nothing to support them. Goldenstategop made a blanket statement, "Orthodox Dawrwinism has been discredited." I pointed out, correctly, that thousands of scientists and millions of people do not agree with his blanket, unsupported claim. That is a fact, but I do not accept evolution because thousands of scientists believe it. I accept it because I believe the evidence supports it. How you managed to stumble to the conclusion that I believe it simply because thousands of other do is beyond me. Should I conclude that you believe in creationism merely because Goldenstategop says evolution has been discredited?

108 posted on 07/18/2007 2:38:33 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson