Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clam Digger

I’m no engineer, but aren’t there always additional safety factors built into any large design?

sor of like “It can withstand a 6.0 quake, maybe even a 8.0 quake, but we cannot guarantee the 8.0 number”

Of course the guys with the pocket protectors cannot come out and say that, if the plant did fail in 8.0, then they would get sued.


43 posted on 07/17/2007 11:13:48 AM PDT by padre35 (Conservative in Exile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: padre35; nuke rocketeer

Let’s pose that one to someone more informed than me.

Nuke - ping to #43


48 posted on 07/17/2007 11:20:14 AM PDT by Clam Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: padre35; Clam Digger

I do not know about Japan, but in the US nuke plants are designed to guarantee safe shutdown for the maximum proposed earthquake, AKA Design Basis Earthquake. Safe shutdown does not mean you will not have piping ruptures or broken equipment or even no radioactive liquid/gas releases, it means that enough equipment survives to place the reactor in a safe shutdown state, where the reactor is shut down and enough cooling water flows to keep it cool and the fuel covered with water. The only equipment that must survive intact is the reactor vessel, control rods/drives, one diesel for power, and one train of Safety Injection/residual heat removal.


53 posted on 07/17/2007 12:59:40 PM PDT by nuke rocketeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson