To: Sub-Driver
Those Dems sure love those Union Dues/Campaign Contributions
2 posted on
07/17/2007 1:18:25 PM PDT by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: Sub-Driver
Where’s their leverage if they can’t strike?
3 posted on
07/17/2007 1:20:52 PM PDT by
JZelle
To: Sub-Driver
Union membership is very low except for Government employees. The unions are desperate to increase their membership and the Dims are desperate to give them as much help as possible.
At least unionizing Government workers doesn't make our industry noncompetitive.
5 posted on
07/17/2007 1:22:23 PM PDT by
Ben Mugged
(Always cheat; always win. The only unfair fight is the one you lose.)
To: Sub-Driver
In California, state and local public unions make large campaign contributions to the same politicans who set their salaries and benefits. As a result, most public employees have lavish salary, benefit and retirement packages that private sector workers can only dream about. To add insult to injury, the public unions are constantly whining about being underpaid. They get away with it since most folks don’t have any clue how well-paid (some would say over-paid) these folks are.
6 posted on
07/17/2007 1:22:47 PM PDT by
jrp
To: Sub-Driver
if this one flies, it won’t be long until “first responder” means lifeguards, crossing guards, anyone at all in health care, rubble haulers, newscasters, fast-food security guards, security camera operators, and a jillion more I can’t think of right now.....
To: Sub-Driver
14 posted on
07/17/2007 1:43:12 PM PDT by
Shots
(If you see Known Illegal Immigrants it is your civic duty to report them)
To: Sub-Driver
Anyone want to enlighten me about what in the US Constitution gives the federal government the authority to regulate this?
I know it is silly to expect our federal government to abide by the restrictions set forth in the constitution, but do they even make an attempt to justify such things?
To: Sub-Driver
The House on Tuesday voted to give all police, firefighters and other first responders the right to collective bargaining, although the legislation also would keep them from going on strike.
The bill, passed 314-97, gives public safety officers the right to join unions and bargain over wages, hours and conditions of employment.
Can someone PLEASE explain to me why government employees are allowed to unionize?
Unions have been manipulated by both sides to create a situation where the workers really don't have to work, they really don't have to fear getting fired, and the Union officals TAKE dues and give it to the Liberals. And in the end, Liberals have created another slow-working monstrosity.
17 posted on
07/17/2007 2:13:01 PM PDT by
Eagle of Liberty
(The United States of America is the only country strong enough to go it alone.)
To: Sub-Driver
Its more than two thirds. Republicans voted for it out of fear of being depicted as "anti-cop", "anti-fireman" and "anti-paramedic."
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
18 posted on
07/17/2007 2:18:10 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: Shuttle Shucker
24 posted on
07/17/2007 3:58:00 PM PDT by
anymouse
To: Sub-Driver
You go in first.
No, I need to join the union and get a raise, you go in first.
No, you go first.
...
To: Sub-Driver
Excuse me, where is the federal issue in this?
To: Sub-Driver
I can eat dirt too, but I have no desire or reason to do so. I was unaware that Va. state law prevented me from unionizing simply because I’ve never even considered the possibility. This bill won’t change that fact.
29 posted on
07/18/2007 3:52:24 AM PDT by
deaconjim
(Because He lives...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson