Posted on 07/17/2007 10:21:03 PM PDT by goldstategop
If you want to stay on the good side of racist David Duke, be sure you don't cross the beloved memory of the godfather of terrorism, Yasser Arafat.
That was the lesson WND learned Thursday when Jerusalem bureau chief Aaron Klein reported one of Arafat's confidantes, Ahmed Jibril, confirmed a French medical report on the cause of his death cited AIDS.
That was enough to set off the Duke machine, which came to the rescue of Arafat's manhood.
"The WND article by Aaron Klein, which came out of the Jerusalem office of WorldNetDaily, couldn't possibly be ZIONIST PROPAGANDA, could it?" the article asked.
Well, since Jibril, the head of Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command terrorist group, originally made the statement on Hezbollah's Manar TV in Lebanon, it would seem like a pretty sophisticated piece of Zionist disinformation.
The writer for WhiteCivilRights.com, the website of the European America Unity and Rights Organization, Duke's new front, went on to set the record straight.
(Column continues below)
"Yasser Arafat was killed by a mystery poison by Israel assassins," he explained. "David Duke was almost killed by a very exotic poison most likely served up on an El Al flight after Duke took a trip to Palestine. That's how the Zionists like to kill high-profile enemies – discreetly."
The racists at WhiteCivilRights.com go on to explain why Arafat could never have died of AIDS, explaining:
* There would have been suggestions of the problem before he died. (There were.)
* Arafat couldn't have died of AIDS because he was overweight.
* Arafat was married to a young trophy wife, so he was obviously heterosexual.
Why is the David Duke machine defending the legacy of one of the biggest mass murderers in history?
Because it's what sick racists do. It's what they always do.
Why do I take the time to respond to the slimy drivel that oozes from the oral orifices of Klansmen and neo-Nazis like Duke?
Because I think it illuminates the character of our real enemy. I think it says something about Duke that he would defend Arafat and something about Arafat that he would be defended in death by Duke.
I think it is worth noting that, like Adolf Hitler before them, the Klansmen and the neo-Nazis are still defending and supporting the Islamo-fascists. Yes, it was Hitler who supported them in the 1930s, and it was the Islamo-fascists (Arafat's "uncle," Haj Amin al-Husseini, the grand mufti of Jerusalem, being the key contact) who supported Hitler and his agenda for eradication of the Jews.
It should surprise no one when we see David Duke speaking at anti-Jewish, anti-American conferences in Iran. And it should surprise no one to witness Duke and his minions defending the legacy of Yasser Arafat.
In fact, it is actions like these that permit Duke and his racists to suggest they are not really anti-Semitic. After all, they explain, Arabs, too, are Semites, being descendants of Noah's son, Shem.
I call that "Shemantics."
Duke and the Nazis before him had no more use for Arabs and Muslims than they had for anyone but their so-called Aryan brotherhood. Muslims and Arabs were and are seen by them as allies of convenience. Give them half a chance and remove the common enemies of Jews and Christians and the Nazis and Muslims, even with their shared ideology of fascism, would be killing each in new and depraved ways – their shared specialty.
Anyway, I'm proud to be a part of a news agency under siege from the David Dukes of the world.
Yep... I’m covering that in my report as well. Everything’s a double standard with them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.