Pertinent excerpts:
Myth: The SPP was an agreement signed by Presidents Bush and his Mexican and Canadian counterparts in Waco, TX, on March 23, 2005.
Fact: The SPP is a dialogue to increase security and enhance prosperity among the three countries. The SPP is not an agreement nor is it a treaty. In fact, no agreement was ever signed.
Myth: The SPP is a movement to merge the United States, Mexico, and Canada into a North American Union and establish a common currency.
Fact: The cooperative efforts under the SPP, which can be found in detail at www.spp.gov, seek to make the United States, Canada and Mexico open to legitimate trade and closed to terrorism and crime. It does not change our courts or legislative processes and respects the sovereignty of the United States, Mexico, and Canada. The SPP in no way, shape or form considers the creation of a European Union-like structure or a common currency. The SPP does not attempt to modify our sovereignty or currency or change the American system of government designed by our Founding Fathers.
Myth: The SPP infringes on the sovereignty of the United States.
Fact: The SPP respects and leaves the unique cultural and legal framework of each of the three countries intact. Nothing in the SPP undermines the U.S. Constitution. In no way does the SPP infringe upon the sovereignty of the United States.
Myth: The SPP is illegal and violates the Constitution.
Fact: The SPP is legal and in no way violates the Constitution or affects the legal authorities of the participating executive agencies. Indeed, the SPP is an opportunity for the governments of the United States, Canada, and Mexico to discuss common goals and identify ways to enhance each nation’s security and prosperity. If an action is identified, U.S. federal agencies can only operate within U.S. law to address these issues. The Departments of Commerce and Homeland Security coordinate the efforts of the agencies responsible for the various initiatives under the prosperity and security pillars of the SPP. If an agency were to decide a regulatory change is desirable through the cooperative efforts of SPP, that agency is required to conform to all existing U.S. laws and administrative procedures, including an opportunity to comment.
All very well, but that’s what the perps say.
Which are the myths, and which are the facts? Are you saying that they just have to say it, and that makes it true?
We have already seen supreme court justices saying that their decisions should be based on “international law and custom,” whatever that means. And we have already seen the EU at work. And we have already seen 20 million Mexicans come in over the border at the invitation of our government, which claims that it cannot do anything to solve the problem.
Good job. Many thanks.
Fact: The SPP respects and leaves the unique cultural and legal framework of each of the three countries intact. Nothing in the SPP undermines the U.S. Constitution. In no way does the SPP infringe upon the sovereignty of the United States.
///////////////////
You have to be a paid flak.
Worse, to have a guy like you on this board who would consciously murder his own country is discouraging
SPP is modeled after the early eu agreements between france and germany back in the 1950’s. You know that. the grand vision was to start with economic union and then proceed to political union. You know that too.
These matters are openly consistantly discussed at places like davos and various internationalist american publications. You know that too.
everything from current de facto free movement of labor to the planned highway & bulk water transfers from canada is set up within the the greater NAU model. You know that too.
And yet you open your mouth and breathe insipid insulting lies.
More americans have been murdered by illegal aliens than have died in Iraq. You best pray you don’t catch a bullit from an illegal alien and die the hopeless shameful death so many American have been forced to die.
You are posting self-serving propaganda by the very government who is pursuing the North American Union/Community.
I told you before, yesterday, I believe, this would not stand up in any court of law as either legitimate or adequate proof to back up denials of the accusations made against the government’s intent.
It does change our courts. Our Supreme court will be regulated to the dust bin of history.
LOL!!!
You are falling for all the lies!!!
Have you ever heard of incrementalism?
Seriously, you aren’t willing to buy that offal, are you?