Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Soldiers Defend Body Armor
Army News Service ^ | July 13, 2007 | Staff Writer

Posted on 07/18/2007 10:37:20 AM PDT by PsyOp

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 07/18/2007 10:37:22 AM PDT by PsyOp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PsyOp
"...Soldiers' Families have been misled by conflicting media reports that left them concerned that the Army might not be doing all it can to protect its Soldiers."

Gee, whose interests would be served by doing that?
</sarc>

2 posted on 07/18/2007 10:46:12 AM PDT by Redbob (WWJBD -"What would Jack Bauer do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
Gee, whose interests would be served by doing that?

The makers of that Lizard Flesh stuff.

3 posted on 07/18/2007 10:49:32 AM PDT by Clam Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp

I am living proof that these things work. I took an AK round square in the middle of my chest during a firefight back in 2004. My SAPI plate stopped it and all I had to show for it was two cracked ribs, bruises in the outline of my dogtags and soiled underwear. The rag who shot me did not fare nearly as well thanks to my guys.


4 posted on 07/18/2007 10:58:57 AM PDT by stm (Fred Thompson in 08! Return our country to the era of Reagan Conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp
We met a moonbat at Walter Reed who bought into the BS going around that our troops had less than the best available body armor and that he had purchased, at his own cost of $5,000, some Dragonskin armor for his kid. The kid was wearing it in violation of orders.

There are reports out there of irregularities in the statements and tests by Dragonskin's manufacturer and in news reports broadcast by NBC News, in particular Lisa Myers. If the reports of misleading the public are true, and it appears that they are, Dragonskin's manufacturer and Lisa Myers have put our troops at risk.

The Moonbats are killing their own kids by buying into any and every Bush Bashing BS that comes along.

MFSO & NBC Lied
Moonbats' Kids Died

5 posted on 07/18/2007 10:59:47 AM PDT by Doctor Raoul (What's the difference between the CIA and the Free Clinic? The Free Clinic knows how to stop leaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stm

Thank you for your service.

God Bless Our Troops.

Marine Mom


6 posted on 07/18/2007 11:00:23 AM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp
Soldiers Defend Body Armor

I would, too. Especially if my hide were inside it.

7 posted on 07/18/2007 11:06:18 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp

You won’t see this on NBC News.


8 posted on 07/18/2007 11:14:21 AM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp
I remember watching CSPAN and a press conference where the Army developers of body armor were demonstrating the equipment and answering questions. Some dumbass reporter asked why what was on display was the "seventh generation" and why that wasn't just provided first? As if they were deliberately NOT fielding the latest and greatest.

The also had a Marine SGT school the dumb bastards about body armor. The discussion centered around "shoulder pads" which the Marines can have, but few use. The reporters were aghast. The SGT looked at them as they were a bunch of dumbasses (which they were) and told them that the key to saving his life on more often being able to get over a wall. And that the "shoulder pads" restricted his ability to do that.

We need a legal licensing requirement for reporters. We don't let lawyers, doctors, pilots or truck drivers practice their profession if they are not qualified.

9 posted on 07/18/2007 11:16:28 AM PDT by Doctor Raoul (What's the difference between the CIA and the Free Clinic? The Free Clinic knows how to stop leaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

My stepson came home with one of these vests to show me while he was on leave. Cool stuff. Heavy but cool.


10 posted on 07/18/2007 11:17:25 AM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul

could this be Darwin’s theory at work if the children of the moonbats are the ones more likely to die because they are not wearing the armor that has been shown to be superior?


11 posted on 07/18/2007 11:21:36 AM PDT by stefanbatory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: stefanbatory

It’s not fair to those kids. We should call whatever agency in that state deals with child protection and report that Dad for endangering his son.


12 posted on 07/18/2007 11:34:35 AM PDT by Doctor Raoul (What's the difference between the CIA and the Free Clinic? The Free Clinic knows how to stop leaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul
Wikipedia has an interesting article on Dragonskin, which I never heard of until this thread. Apparently, if I read the article correctly, the Dragonskin ceramic discs fall apart, or become dislodged somehow, at temperatures above 120 degrees F. I can understand the military’s reservations, as this would be less than ideal in desert conditions.
13 posted on 07/18/2007 11:55:13 AM PDT by PUGACHEV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul

They’re over 18...not much to do with child protective services anymore by then...


14 posted on 07/18/2007 12:44:56 PM PDT by stefanbatory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: stm
I remember going out on an ambush in '68, we were walking to the main gate at Cu Chi before the gates closed and some dude driving a M151 skidded to a halt after a gun shot.

The guy driving the Jeep took a round in the back through two layers of his flack jacket, draped over his seat. One of our medically inclined did a quick survey and found a surface wound, scraped the round out with a knife.

You guys have a lot better stuff than we did, we used to call the inserts that Huey gunners wore "Chicken Plates"

15 posted on 07/18/2007 12:55:27 PM PDT by Little Bill (Welcome to the Newly Socialist State of New Hampshire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill

We went through the war in 03 with the Vietnam era flak jackets. We used to sit on them in the HMMWV’s, they for damn sure were not much good to us any other way.


16 posted on 07/18/2007 1:43:44 PM PDT by stm (Fred Thompson in 08! Return our country to the era of Reagan Conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp

who’s to say that the armor isn’t good, just that the dragon skin is better? i saw an actual demonstration on future weapons on the discovery channel. looked to me like dragon skin is amazing.


17 posted on 07/18/2007 1:46:43 PM PDT by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stm

Glad to hear it. My brother was saved by a Second Chance vest years ago when he was working as a security guard. Nothing as powerfull as an Ak round though.

After all the articles slamming the body armor our folks are wearing (like my own kid currently in the green zone), I thought this one showed the up side we’ll never hear on CNN.


18 posted on 07/18/2007 4:34:52 PM PDT by PsyOp (Truth in itself is rarely sufficient to make men act. - Clauswitz, On War, 1832.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul

Last night on the Military channel the program “Future Weapons” hosted by that ex-Seal had a segment on the DragonSkin body armor. They shot it full of 5.56 and 7.62 steel-core AP rounds and it stopped them all. Then they threw the shot up vest over a fragmentation grenade. No penetration.

If it works as demonstrated in the show, the stuff is pretty awsome. Perhpas better than what is being used now. But the point of the article is that the stuff we have now works pretty good.


19 posted on 07/18/2007 4:39:10 PM PDT by PsyOp (Truth in itself is rarely sufficient to make men act. - Clauswitz, On War, 1832.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thefactor
i saw an actual demonstration on future weapons...

I saw the same show last night. It looked like solid stuff to me.

20 posted on 07/18/2007 4:41:27 PM PDT by PsyOp (Truth in itself is rarely sufficient to make men act. - Clauswitz, On War, 1832.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson