To: ovrtaxt
This North American Union is shaking up the old left/right paradigm. For example, the People's Global Action, a leftist protest group, is against it, while LaRaza for example, is for it. On the right, we have corporate and 'free-trade' interests for it, while those of us who believe in national sovereignty and border enforcement are against.Undoubtedly most of the protestors will be grungy leftists and black clad anarchists. They will be in the street carrying on, not the conservative attackers of SPP
52 posted on
07/19/2007 6:48:06 AM PDT by
dennisw
To: dennisw
As long as they attract attention and help educate bystanders to what’s happening with our sovereignty, I’ll support them.
54 posted on
07/19/2007 6:55:56 AM PDT by
B4Ranch
( "Freedom is not free, but the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share.")
To: dennisw
Undoubtedly most of the protestors will be grungy leftists and black clad anarchists. They will be in the street carrying on, not the conservative attackers of SPP
That actually enforces the dialectic they are using to coerce change. If you are an anti-globalists then you side with anarchy and communism, they will say, so how can a loyal American be against their globalist agenda? Their synthesis will be something marginally less unpalatable.
57 posted on
07/19/2007 7:02:51 AM PDT by
hedgetrimmer
(I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson