Posted on 07/20/2007 6:29:22 AM PDT by rhema
A remarkable thing happened in the United States Senate earlier this evening, and it occurred over a rather unremarkable piece of legislation that was being debated. Conservatives, frustrated at the lack of a genuine leader of their party, may have finally found one in Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell.
After Democratic leader Harry Reids MoveOn.org all-night session Tuesday night, a move that resulted only in helping unify the weak-kneed Republicans who were peeling away from continued support of the Petraeus surge in Iraq, McConnell, the Republican leader, served notice to anyone watching C-SPAN that he now runs the Senate.
The Senate spent much of the day discussing the merits, or demerits, of HR 2669, the Student Loans and Grants Act. Maybe it was the culmination of a long week already, or maybe it was the upper chamber being lulled off guard by the increasingly senile senior Senator from West Virginia, Robert Byrd, who spent 25 minutes decrying the plight of the helpless fight dog in response to the weird Michael Vick story in the news, but tonight, McConnell and the Republicans decided to take control of the Senate. The Republicans offered amendment after amendment to the bill, catching the Democrats flat-footed. In case you want to hear about the plight of the fight dog, heres Robert Byrds Senate floor address.
After a couple of Republican amendments failed, Mitch McConnell took to the floor and offered his own amendment, which was a Sense of the Senate that Guantanamo detainees not be allowed released or moved to U.S. soil. To conservatives, this obviously makes sense. To liberals, especially Californias Dianne Feinstein, one of the chief proponents of the effort to close the detention center at Gitmo and relocate these detainees into the American justice system, especially when tagged onto a student loan and grant bill, youd think this measure would go down in flames. Except a funny thing happened. The bill was titled in a way that you had to vote yes to vote no, and no to vote yes. The final vote was 94-3, officially putting the Senate on record as saying terrorist detainees shouldnt be moved to the U.S. Before the Democrats, who clearly hadnt read the amendment, realized they screwed up, the vote was recorded.
Jim DeMint of South Carolina was the author of the next amendment in line, had just gotten the consent of Bernie Sanders, the presiding officer, to order the yeas and nays. Up stepped Massachusetts senior Senator Ted Kennedy, now obviously aware that he and his colleagues just got bamboozled, and went on a full-throated rant, with reckless disregard to obvious hypocrisy, and blasted DeMint and the Republicans for slowing down the works in the Senate. The rant is worth hearing, so here it is.
Once the rant was over, Kennedy threw the Senate into a quorum call so that the Democrats could regroup. The session progressed well into the night, and McConnell could easily have rested on his laurels, but he wasnt finished. Colorado Democrat Ken Salazar offered his own irrelevant amendment, asking for a sense of the Senate that President Bush not pardon Scooter Libby. McConnell, with that wry smile he offers when hes up to something, countered with a secondary amendment to Salazars, saying that if its fair to bring up the Senates view of potential future inappropriate pardons, maybe we should also have a sense of the Senate of past inappropriate pardons, and proceeded to maneuver the Senate clerk into reading off the laundry list of Clinton administration pardons, including those of Marc Rich and others, which again set the Democrats off in a tailspin. After throwing the Senate back into a quorum call for half an hour, the beleaguered Harry Reid came out and pulled the Salazar amendment off the floor. Hed been Mitchslapped twice in one night.
Once again, the senior Senator from Massachusetts took to the floor, this time directing his venom at McConnell. Heres the audio and text.
What in the world does the Republican leader have against this legislation? The legislation that we have here before the United States Senate passed 17-3. The authorizing provision that changes policy was virtually unanimous. Young people all over the country are looking in here in the United States Senate. This is about the future of this next generation. Their hopes and their dreams. Its about our country and being able to compete in the world. Its about the quality of our armed forces, about getting well-trained, well-educated young people. Its about our institution, whether theyre going to be functioning and working. Why cant we go ahead and vote on this legislation? We were here for two days, waiting for different amendments on education. And few of them came. Why in the world are you holding up this legislation that means so much to the future of our young people. Were prepared to vote. We didnt have amendments over here on our side. We want to get this legislation going ahead. Were looking forward to the reauthorization debate for next week, and were looking forward to getting something worthy of this institution. We, in the 45 years Ive been in the United States Senate, under the leadership of Stafford of Vermont, of Claiborne Pell of Rhode Island, of the members that we have had here, we have had true...
The Senators time is expired.
Kennedy: Why are we disrupting
Senators time is expired.
If anyone really believes Senator Kennedy hasnt seen obstruction like this in his 45 years, then they havent met Judges Priscilla Owen, Janice Rogers Brown, William Myers, William Pryor, Henry Saad, Richard Griffin, David McKeague, Miguel Estrada, Peter Keisler, Charles Pickering, or Leslie Southwick. While some of these judges eventually got onto the bench as part of the Gang of 14 deal, there are many who were scuttled as part of the deal, and Keisler and Southwick continue to languish at the hands of the Pat Leahy controlled Judiciary Committee, of which Kennedy is a member. Kennedy is no stranger to preventing votes from being taken.
Senator Kennedy isnt angry at Republicans tonight anyway. Any conservative who watched the debate in the evening recognizes the frustration in him. Its the same frustration conservatives had between 2005 and the beginning of this year when Bill Frist, the affable but ineffective Republican majority leader, consistently mismanaged the Senate. Ted Kennedy is angry at Harry Reid, because in seven short months, Mitch McConnell has run rings around him on issues from Iraq to immigration, and tonight, he just flat-out schooled Reid on how the Senate works, as if to say to Reid you messed with us two nights ago on a PR stunt for your fringe base, heres how things like that can be answered.
And considering the fact that McConnell, Republican Conference Chairman Jon Kyl and other GOP Senators have been vocal about the growing frustration that the Democrats are not processing judicial nominees in good faith, and the coming slowdown showdown that really could grind things to a halt as a consequence of continued Democratic inaction on these nominees, if I were Kennedy, Id be real nervous about who my leader was.
The political landscape in Washington, D.C. would be completely different if McConnell would have been running the Senate the last two years rather than Senator Frist. While Dr. Frist was and remains a good conservative, ideologically speaking, he simply could not deliver the fight in the Senate that the conservative base by and large wanted to see happen while they had the numbers in the majority they did.
Over the next 16 months, there are going to be many issues the Senate should be taking up but wont, and many other issues it has no business debating but will. Obviously, nobody is pleased with the performance of the Republicans in the Senate overall in the last few years. Members who have strayed off the reservation on core conservative issues have been too numerous to count. But the fact of the matter is there was one amendment by Minnesota Senator Norm Coleman that failed on almost a purely party line vote that should make all conservatives pause before they wash their hands of the party November next. Senator Coleman tried to require as an amendment to this bill that the FCC not be allowed to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine, and was defeated 49-48. All Republicans present voted yes, all Democrats present, including Hillary Clinton but excluding Indianas Evan Bayh, voted no.
Make no mistake about it, if the Democrats gain the White House next November, and Republicans get so lost in which Senator voted what way on this or that, causing the Democrats to pick up additional seats, the Fairness Doctrine might very well be in play, and could take years before the Court could rule it unconstitutional. Goodbye talk radio.
The Senate surely has made the base nervous at best and disgusted at worst in the seven months of the McConnell tenure. But if you look at the stats, when all is said and done, when the base needed him, hes been there. He successfully kept the Republicans in line on multiple time certain withdrawal resolutions in the Senate, skillfully allowed the immigration bill to die while at least giving it a chance to be debated, and tonight showed the ability that he has no reservations about going toe to toe with Harry Reid and beating him repeatedly. Its time conservatives use the old Reagan adage, trust but verify, and continue to support and encourage Mitch McConnell, and work to add to his numbers in the Senate next November.
“Hed been Mitchslapped twice in one night.”
I liked that line!!!
I LIKE THAT WORD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!..............
LOL
McConnell was a squish on immigration. Sessions should be Senate leader for the Republicans.
"Hed been Mitchslapped twice in one night."
Bring out all the freepers who threw Mitch under the bus during the Immigration debate.
Mitch is a shining star, best thing we’ve got going, and yet the conservapurists hated him.
He needs to continue to Mitchslap Harry Ried until he gets some sense.
DEMOCRATS BLOCK COLEMAN AMENDMENT TO PREVENT REINSTATEMENT OF THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE
I like it when the Republicans fight like junkyard dogs instead of whining and cringing like the whipped curs they've been for the past too many years.
Bump for later reading
Still, McConnell is no Trent Lott.
I think McConnell is the best in the Senate. Too bad he supported that ridiculous immigration bill.
I just absolutely loved it when they read the list of who Clinton had pardoned.
But, it was like a comedy watching the whole session. What a bunch of clowns we have running this country.
The Swimmer just wanted to show how much he cares on the anniversary week of Mary Jo. 38 years, he could have served his time for murder and been out by now.
He earned it.
What makes McConnell better than Sessions?
Demint ain’t too bad. He at least has a pair.
Could you guys help me compile a list of all the conservapurists who couldn't get Mitch under the bus fast enough? I'd sure like to compile a good ping list of you guys for all the good things Mitch does and how many times he's saving America's ass these days, against the hysteria of his own 'base.'
Cuz I'm sure you guys are eager to keep him on our side and not toss him overboard like we did DeLay etal....
McConnell just got lucky. For the past 10 years or so, the Senior Senate Republicans have proven themselves to be gutless and spineless. Some of the newer faces like DeMint and Sessions have a spine and are standing up for the Conservative Agenda.
Specter, McConnell, Lott, Hatch, Lugar and the rest of that bunch are totally worthless.
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.