Posted on 07/20/2007 11:07:55 PM PDT by doesnt suffer fools gladly
OxyContin, Execs Fined $634 Million
ABINGDON, Va. (AP) - Purdue Pharma L.P., the maker of OxyContin, and three of its executives were ordered Friday to pay a $634.5 million fine for misleading the public about the painkiller's risk of addiction.
U.S. District Judge James Jones levied the fine on Purdue, its top lawyer and former president and former chief medical officer after a hearing that lasted about four-and-a-half hours. The hearing included statements by numerous people who said their lives were changed forever by addiction to OxyContin, a trade name for a long-acting form of the painkiller oxycodone.
Designed to be swallowed whole and digested over 12 hours, the pills can produce a heroin-like high if crushed and then swallowed, snorted or injected.
From 1996 to 2001, the number of oxycodone-related deaths nationwide increased fivefold while the annual number of OxyContin prescriptions increased nearly 20-fold, according to a report by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration. In 2002, the DEA said the drug caused 146 deaths and contributed to another 318.
Purdue Pharma L.P., its top lawyer and former president and former chief medical officer pleaded guilty in May to claiming to doctors that OxyContin was less addictive and less subject to abuse than other pain medications. The sentencing Friday ends the national case.
Michael Friedman, who retired in June as Purdue's president, general counsel Howard Udell and former chief medical officer Paul Goldenheim each pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor count of misbranding the drug. Of the total fine, $34.5 million was levied on those three.
Jones placed the company on probation for five years and each of the executives on probation for three years. He also ordered the three to perform 400 hours of community service related to prevention of prescription drug abuse.
Former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani played a central role in negotiating on behalf of Purdue with federal prosecutors, but Jones said "I completely reject" suggestions that political influence resulted in a lesser punishment for Purdue.
Many of the nearly 20 speakers called for jail terms for Friedman, Udell and Goldenheim, saying the fines were a small price for the devastation to lives from OxyContin addiction.
"Money can't buy all the lives that are lost," said Robert Palmisano, 23, who said he was addicted to OxyContin for four years but has been off the drug for 17 months.
Attorneys for the three executives said giving them criminal convictions was punishment enough, and noted they were charged because of their job titles, not because they themselves promoted OxyContin as a drug with little addiction potential.
"They are not here today because of any acts of misconduct on their part," defense attorney Howard Shapiro said. "They are good men."
The speakers, many of whose children died after trying the drug only once, disagreed.
"I feel you are legal drug users, nothing more than a large corporate drug cartel," Lee Nuss of Palm Coast, Fla., said as she addressed the Purdue Pharma contingent.
Nuss held up a stone urn slightly larger than a pill bottle that she said contained her 18-year-old son's ashes.
Attorneys for both sides acknowledged the pain of those who had lost loved ones, but urged Jones to accept the plea agreement.
"By pleading guilty they acknowledged that doing nothing was not good enough," Assistant U.S. Attorney Randy Ramseyer said. "We cannot bring those people back. It's not something this case can do."
Dillie Walker and his wife Joyce of Bay City, Mich., testified on behalf of Purdue that OxyContin has enabled them to function again despite chronic pain.
"I don't get high from it. It goes straight to my pain," Dillie Walker said.
But Kenny Keith of Roanoke said it took very little time for him to get addicted after he was prescribed OxyContin.
"The withdrawals were worse than the pain I was having," he said.
Jones said he would have preferred to have the plea agreements call for spending money on education of those at risk of drug abuse and treatment of those who are addicted to OxyContin. But Jones said he would not reject the agreement.
"Many young people mistakenly believe today that prescription drugs are safer than other drugs," Jones said.
The fines are to be distributed to state and federal law enforcement agencies, the federal government, federal and state Medicaid programs, a Virginia prescription monitoring program and individuals who had sued the company. About $5 million will go toward a six-year company program to monitor compliance with the agreement.
Survivors of the victims want the Food and Drug Administration to reclassify OxyContin for use only for severe pain. The drug currently can be prescribed for moderate pain.
Purdue, based in Stamford, Conn., has said it accepted responsibility for its employees' actions and has put in place training and monitoring programs to ensure overpromotion of OxyContin doesn't happen again. But officials objected to any ties between the plea agreement and abuse of the drug.
The coal-mining region of southwest Virginia where the sentencing took place has had a number of oxycodone-related deaths - 119 from 2003 through 2005, according to the state medical examiner's office.
Circle of Life, until we get Tort Reform. Sorry for the families, but, um, can no one think for themselves?
Meanwhile, the rest of us suffer from higher Rx prices unless we can manage to smuggle from the Third World.
For shame. John Edwards, please pick up the courtesy phone.
Are you kidding? No one is expected to be responsible for their actions anymore..... especially if they see there's a quick buck to be had.
How about all the people that can now lead normal lives because Oxcontin has provided their first relief from chronic severe pain? Would their testimony count?
Litigation Lottery. The world is fallen.
No good deed goes unpunished. Great point, LC.
Are automakers fined because of all the deaths that their products are responsible for?
I was run over while attempting to make an arrest in 2001. I had to have 1/4 of my knee cap remove and my lumbar spine was shattered on 3 levels. In fact, in 4 days I will be having my 5th surgery on my lower back. I have been on Oxycontin since 2003 and my life was given back to me the day I filled my first script. I was able to go back to school full-time (will finish in the spring), am able to sleep through the night, can play with my children, and most importantly, I can sit in front of my computer and Freep all I want. None of which I could do without the Oxycontin.
So far, I have not robbed any liqueur stores, mugged any old women, or crashed into any brick walls at 2am going to "Vote". I have also withdrawn from Oxycontin on 5 separate occasions under the supervision of my doctors for various reasons and have never had to spend any time in rehab to do it.
The funny thing is, my doctors told me of the danger of addiction and that it comes from abusing it, so oddly enough, I chose not to abuse it.
The ad slogan that Oxycontin uses is, "It Works." They aren't kidding.
The fines are to be distributed to state and federal law enforcement agencies, the federal government, federal and state Medicaid programs, a Virginia prescription monitoring program and individuals who had sued the company. About $5 million will go toward a six-year company program to monitor compliance with the agreement.
Yep, more fleecing of the public by lawyers and government. Now another good medication will be more severly restricted due to the actions of those who will not follow their prescription instructions.
This is BS!
"SSDD" from the seat of Enlightenment-era Liberty. You're being far too kind.
Wonder where that money is really going?
I hope that the people, cops, prosecutors and legislators that make it difficult and expensive for people in severe chronic pain to get the drugs they need for relief will die screaming. And take a long time to do it.
If the argument is that simply because one can misuse a product that the maker is liable for that potential misuse, then I have very little sympathy for that argument.
Does this mean that if someone burns himself while using gasoline to start a bonfire that Exxon is somehow liable? Gasoline, while it is indeed one way to start a bonfire, isn't manufactured to be used in that way. Misusing it in a way that the manufacturer had not intended seems to me the fault of the misuser, not of the manufacturer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.