“Even if you believe they should not have shot the fleeing dope dealer in the butt , they have suffered enough.”
No, I believe they should have shot him in the back of the head.
>>No, I believe they should have shot him in the back of the head.<<
The prosecution was certainly a crock - they misled the jury about the smuggler’s past and his truthfullness.
But, in general, law enforcement should not shoot somebody in the back when all they know is that he is strongly suspected of entering the country illegally and doesn’t want to be questioned.
Now the Prosecution knew the whole story and never should have gone for such a lengthy harsh sentence. The prosecution is also covering up and should be punished.
But I don’t want cops shooting unarmed people down from behind over suspicion of a non-violent crime. So I am not sorry they were convicted of something, even if this particular person they shot turned out to be a scumbag.