Not sure about the guardian part, but it looks like she means to vigorously exercise her Fifth Amendment right to "a compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence".
>>>but it looks like she means to vigorously exercise her Fifth Amendment right to “a compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence”.
And who deprived her of either? That has no bearing on the red meat she is throwing out for the conspiracy kooks, trying to change the focus from her indictment as a pimp, into a Rosie O’Donnell type moonbat carnival.
>>>Not everyone that listens with an open mind is a crackpot
Of course they aren’t. I think its main audience component is people who just enjoy the freak show, similar to Rosie on the View. But the ones who ARE, that’s the basic target audience in the pimp lady’s campaign to muddy the water on Coast to Coast and any other sympathetic venue she can find.
Again, I salute her. It’s clever. Reminds me of mafia boss Crazy Joe Gallo’s campaign against the FBI, crying to the press it was a racist anti-Italian conspiracy to charge him with Cosa Nostra crimes. His storyline was by fighting the charges against him he defended all Italians and stood up to the real (Italian hating) government criminals. He led protest marches with thousands of well-wishers and became a hero to the crackpots of the day. Worked real well for him too, up to the point rival Mafiosi gunned him down at one of those same rallies.
Maybe the pimp lady will learn from his mistake and avoid calling for DU/Moveon/Coast to Coast listener rallies.
One last thought, she suggests the government wanted her phone numbers to blackmail people. Does anybody think they couldn’t have gotten them from the phone companies?