Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruise shoots controversial movie ["Valkyrie" Cruise plays Col. Claus von Stauffenberg]
BBC.com ^ | Friday, 20 July 2007 | staff writer

Posted on 07/22/2007 4:02:55 AM PDT by yankeedame

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: yankeedame
Yesterday's NY Post had a short article on the film, but more important, he mentioned a new book that is being sent around to prospective publishers. It looks pretty interesting. It's title for now is "13 Steps" and is about the lives of 150 of the Nazis executed as a result of the Nuremburg Trials. It's contents are based on the recollections of Major Joe Williams, now 90, who oversaw the hangings and firing squad executions at Bavaria's Landsberg Prison. It's supposed to be pretty brutal in its discussion of the atrocities perpetrated by those put to death. I'm making a note of the books authors and title so I can keep a track on it publication. Sounds like a good read to me. Here's the link to the Page Six article in the NY Post:

New Book Details Nazi Horrors

21 posted on 07/22/2007 6:43:19 AM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway~~John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: windsorknot

Yes. That’s primarily the movie I was thinking of too.


22 posted on 07/22/2007 6:46:33 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (The FairTax and the North American Union are mutually exclusive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

Any movie where at the end he’s put up against a wall and shot. Cant be all bad.


23 posted on 07/22/2007 6:50:22 AM PDT by BigCinBigD (You "abort" bad missile launches and carrier landings. Not babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

If “The Last Samurai” is any indication, this movie will jump the shark from docu-drama to Cult of Cruise fantasy by the second reel.


24 posted on 07/22/2007 7:23:47 AM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

Any want to post the animated GIF where he fries Oprah with his Scientological powers?


25 posted on 07/22/2007 7:39:33 AM PDT by Cheburashka (Occam's razor. It doesn't work 100% of the time, but 99%+ is not too shabby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

It’s about time this story be told to a wider audience. The men who were with him are true heroes. It’s interesting to note that if Stauffenberg had succeeded Erwin Rommel would have assumed the top post. Rommel was a tough but honorable opponent in war but was someone that even Winston Churchill could speak well of as an honorable man during the war in front of the House of Commons. It’s possible Rommel could have ended the war in the summer of 1944 with the saving of countless lives.

Stauffenberg is a lesson I hope our own military takes to heart. Because when the time comes to defend the American people from it’s own criminal government (and yes that day is coming) I hope there will be soldiers brave enough to take care of the people like the Pelossis, the Reids, the Kennedys, the Lotts, and the Bushes. We can only hope.


26 posted on 07/22/2007 12:13:25 PM PDT by Bookie1066 (What part of illegal don't you understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

That picture is GaAAAAAay.


27 posted on 07/22/2007 12:16:04 PM PDT by Checkers (Enforce the law & build the wall. So easy, a caveman could do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sig226

Excuse me, but the position of the German government is, that the Cult aims to earn money as the primary cause, and not to express a certain belief. Given this assumption is right (which I do believe), the German government is fully right in denying the Cult the status of a religious organization.


28 posted on 07/22/2007 12:49:03 PM PDT by Michael81Dus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
U-571 brought in $127 million ($77 million domestic and $50 million foreign) on a $62 million budget.

But you are correct, most modern WW2 movies have been flops. The Thin Red Line (a very lousy movie) and The Great Raid (a wonderful movie) were both box office nightmares.

29 posted on 07/22/2007 1:08:00 PM PDT by Stonewall Jackson (The Hunt for FRed November. 11/04/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Michael81Dus

If they were making a film that parroted a bunch of L. Ron Hoover’s drivel, I’d agree with you. It’s difficult to see how Appliantology (Scientology) deserves its non profit status in the this country. If he was trying to recruit members or promote the group and German laws considered that an illegal activity, they’d have reason to bar him. But the film has nothing to do with that, and they were bothering Cruise because of his membership in the group. That’s wrong.

Besides, when Cruise starts talking about Scientology, it doesn’t seem to advance their cause very much, does it? :)


30 posted on 07/22/2007 4:32:05 PM PDT by sig226 (Every time I hit spell check, the fishies got all messed up. 'Bye fishies . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Stonewall Jackson; pepsionice

War movies in general have bombed over the past decade.


31 posted on 07/22/2007 4:34:18 PM PDT by Clemenza (Rudy Giuliani, like Pesto and Seattle, belongs in the scrap heap of '90s Culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
War movies in general have bombed over the past decade.

Was that a pun?

32 posted on 07/22/2007 4:36:01 PM PDT by darkangel82 (Socialism is NOT an American value.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Bookie1066

There was a pretty good made-for-TV movie about Stauffenberg made around 1990. I believe the late Brad Davis (of Midnight Express fame) played Stauffenberg.


33 posted on 07/22/2007 4:36:15 PM PDT by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82
Yes, but NOT intended.

War movies just aren't good box office anymore. The younger generation has no interest, and the boomers don't want either the rah rah films of their parents generation, nor the weepy, whiny films characteristic of the late 70s-mid 80s.

34 posted on 07/22/2007 4:39:05 PM PDT by Clemenza (Rudy Giuliani, like Pesto and Seattle, belongs in the scrap heap of '90s Culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Hmm, and what do Brad Davis and Tom Cruising have in common? ;-)


35 posted on 07/22/2007 4:40:06 PM PDT by Clemenza (Rudy Giuliani, like Pesto and Seattle, belongs in the scrap heap of '90s Culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

Cruise is without a doubt, your standard Hollyweird
personality.

But, he is a great actor.


36 posted on 07/22/2007 4:52:19 PM PDT by primeval patriot (Let's go to the Off-World! Brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez Corporation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
Kenneth Branaugh is awesome. Cruise is a dork, though.

We already know the ending. Cruise will simply do his trademark smirk after planting the bomb while the Branagh--as a composite of Bush/Hitler-- will thank him profusely for his service when Tom turns to leave. The final scene will show Cruise (still with the smirk) walking away from the bunker as it blows up behind him. Then the credits will roll and there'll be a tiny footnote on the screen after the crowds leave saying that Hitler survived the blast and had the colonel killed.

37 posted on 07/22/2007 6:06:38 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sig226

Look, Cruise wanted to act on the property site of the government, the original site where the resistance group was shot. If the moviemakers had had a right to film there, they could have filed a lawsuit. They didn´t, so they simply had no right. It´s a difference between arresting people for their beliefs and just denying access to your property. Or would you allow Hollywood to film on your ground??


38 posted on 07/22/2007 10:49:23 PM PDT by Michael81Dus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: sig226; Michael81Dus
The only people to whom the film might be controversial are neo nazis who disagree with the portrayal of Stauffenberg as a hero.

The son of Stauffenberg, Berthold Maria Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg does not want Tom Cruise falsifing the story of this father into a new heartbreaking and smeary Hollywood show. You can be assured that he is no neo-nazi. As a self-confessed catholic he probably rejects such so called "religions" like "Scientology" completely.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1854818/posts

Besides - The Stauffenbergs had their small chateau in Lautlingen next to the village I grew up (Pfeffingen) in southern Germany on the Swabian Alb. They gave it away to the city of Albstadt. Today it is used as a museum for old pianos. The Stauffenberg family still owns a lonesome manor-house with a farm in Lautlingen. They live there seclusive. Stauffenbergs son, Berthold Maria Graf Schenk von Stauffenberg is a retired Major General of the Bundeswehr (the German army) and a very respected person in Germany.

Although the plot on Hitler failed, his father, Claus Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg is a (if not THE) German national hero.

39 posted on 07/22/2007 10:52:52 PM PDT by Atlantic Bridge (In varieatate concordia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Michael81Dus

Hollywood tends to pay rather well when they do such things.


40 posted on 07/23/2007 3:30:24 AM PDT by sig226 (Every time I hit spell check, the fishies got all messed up. 'Bye fishies . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson