Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Korea might not list its nuclear weapons (only facilities)
JoongAng Ilbo ^ | 07/23/07 | Brian Lee

Posted on 07/22/2007 8:05:42 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

North Korea might not list its nuclear weapons
July 23, 2007
BEIJING ― When North Korea declares its nuclear programs, nuclear weapons may not be on that list, Kim Gye-gwan, the North’s chief nuclear negotiator to the six-party talks, indicated on Saturday.
Kim talked to South Korean reporters who spotted him here as he was heading toward the departure gate of the North’s Air Koryo, flying home after the latest round of denuclearization talks. Reporters asked Kim a total of four times whether the North was willing to include nuclear weapons when it declares its nuclear programs. He did not directly answer, but then the fourth time he was asked, he replied by taking the focus off the weapons and putting it on the Yongbyon reactor, where the North’s program is established.
“What we are now discussing is the issue of current nuclear plans,” Kim said. “In detail, that means the shutdown and disablement of the Yongbyon nuclear reactor. In order for the ultimate dismantlement to come, a light-water reactor has to be provided to the North.”
The North has frequently requested a light-water reactor as part of its aid. When a reporter suggested that declaring nuclear weapons would help increase trust, Kim replied, “Trust is something that we will take a look at as it is established.”
Although his South Korean counterpart, Chun Young-woo, earlier hinted strongly to reporters that Pyongyang had given indications it was willing to include nuclear weapons in the declaration phase, Kim’s comments dampened such hopes.
In the February agreement, Pyongyang committed itself to declaring all of its existing nuclear programs, but the question of whether that included nuclear weapons was never made clear.
Observers and government officials here have suspected that Pyongyang wants to draw a line between nuclear programs and nuclear weapons, the latter of which North Korea would use as its biggest bargaining chip.
In September 2005, the six nations in the nuclear talks agreed to a deal that set out the broad parameters of the February agreement and focused on the implementation phase of the deal. The joint statement then stated that nations agreed “to discuss at an appropriate time the subject of the provision of a light-water reactor to the DPRK.”
The day after the agreement was reached, Kim told reporters that anything less than the provision of a light-water reactor would be a cause for the deal to collapse. Other parties’ negotiators are countering this “salami tactic,” a piece-by-piece negotiating approach, saying that the required declaration of all nuclear programs includes nuclear weapons by definition.
In the most recent session, Christopher Hill, Washington’s chief negotiator to the six-party talks, detailed what he thought was in the declaration phase. He said that fissile material, nuclear explosive devices and devices put on missile delivery systems all needed to be declared, in addition to the nuclear facilities.


By Brian Lee Staff Writer [africanu@joongang.co.kr]


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: geopolitics; korea; nuke; nukeprogramtlr; proliferation; tlr
I am quite skeptical that N. Korea would declare nuke facilities unknown to outsiders. Now we have this news that nuke weapons may not be scrapped.
1 posted on 07/22/2007 8:05:46 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; nw_arizona_granny; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 07/22/2007 8:06:22 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Is anyone surprised ?


3 posted on 07/22/2007 8:08:54 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
No. On the bright side of this sorry escapade, I enjoy seeing Foggy Bottom and CFR screwed royally by Chia Head.
I hope they age faster than their peers, and may their inflated financial portfolios pop and make them die of heart attack. I hope so-called international businessmen pushing this sorry agenda meet the same fate.
4 posted on 07/22/2007 8:15:27 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Correction: international businessmen pushing cheering for this sorry agenda
5 posted on 07/22/2007 8:16:54 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
"I wirr rist our nucrear facirities onry!"
6 posted on 07/22/2007 8:20:14 AM PDT by RepublitarianRoger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Nuke weapons are just another bargaining chip held in reserve. When that is resolved, there will have to be another reactor negotiation.

And on and on. Meanwhile, Kim is still printing and using US$100 bills.


7 posted on 07/22/2007 8:24:57 AM PDT by Judith Anne (Thank you St. Jude for favors granted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

In other news, bears might s-— in the woods.


8 posted on 07/22/2007 9:15:39 AM PDT by oakcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; Jet Jaguar; monkapotamus; All

NO KIDDING Tiger


9 posted on 07/22/2007 9:21:01 AM PDT by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I think there is still some discussion about whether their cardboard box nukes actually work, or if they might fizzle like the first Paki nukes did, since they share the same design.


10 posted on 07/22/2007 9:25:09 AM PDT by Wiseghy ("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

The trouble is, Foggy Bottom likes it.


11 posted on 07/22/2007 11:31:11 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Everyone saw this coming.


12 posted on 07/22/2007 3:45:11 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Open Borders and Shamnesty!/Appeasement of North Korea!/No Win Wars!--I've HAD IT WITH PRES. BUSH!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Too bad we can’t melt their phones like the amnesty bill...
13 posted on 07/22/2007 4:04:14 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Thanks for posting this.

Not a surprise to me, only to our leaders, who cannot see around the corner to what comes next.


14 posted on 07/22/2007 6:38:29 PM PDT by nw_arizona_granny ( Today is a good day for working on some heavy praying. The world needs God to hear them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson