To: Minn
F-—ing brats need to learn to keep their hands to themselves. Why is something that would result in criminal charges in the workplace just pooh-poohed when it takes place in government schools?
3 posted on
07/24/2007 8:29:31 AM PDT by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
To: mvpel
Whatever you say, Mr. Nifong.
7 posted on
07/24/2007 8:34:17 AM PDT by
Minn
(Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
To: mvpel
Just when you think FReepers are basically decent people.
8 posted on
07/24/2007 8:35:40 AM PDT by
Minn
(Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
To: mvpel
You'd have had fun being a kid in 1952 or thereabouts. Class C fireworks, BB-gun fights, tackle football...
The neatest thing of all was that asphalt hadn't been invented and roads were made out of tar and gravel, and there were always pools of leftover tar lying around to roll the neighbor kids in. About the only cure for that was bathing the kid in gasoline.
10 posted on
07/24/2007 8:38:21 AM PDT by
jeddavis
To: mvpel
Farking prosecutor needs to be sh*tcanned, the principal fired and the cops relieved of duty.
This is sheer overreactive madness on the part of the PC leftist crowd that refuses to allow boys to be boys.
Was it wrong? yep
Was it chargeable? Nope
Dad needs to sit them down and have a talk with them or take them behind the woodshed for some personal time. But the reaction by the powers that be is ludicrous.
To: mvpel
The kids need some discipline, but dragging them into the criminal justice system? Your kidding right.
Right, you probably aren’t kidding since Free Republic is now populated with statists.
19 posted on
07/24/2007 8:54:21 AM PDT by
DariusBane
(Shock and Awe used to mean something! (Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Tokyo and Dresden))
To: mvpel
What woman do you know who would rather file criminal charges than slap the hell out of a guy who did that?
20 posted on
07/24/2007 9:00:26 AM PDT by
Xenalyte
(Lord, I apologize . . . and be with the starving pygmies in New Guinea amen.)
To: mvpel
I believe you would win this contest hands down.
28 posted on
07/24/2007 9:21:13 AM PDT by
rednesss
(Fred Thompson - 2008)
To: mvpel
Good grief-you can’t be serious. This is extremely stupid on the part of the prosecuter and shows the dangers inherent in our legalistic justice system-common sense has gone out the window.
These kids were playing around. And then you have case like one I personally know about in Pennsylvania where a child molester (cousin of personal friend) was caught in the act with a three year old...was a boy scout leader and molested God knows how many kids. He received three years in jail.
37 posted on
07/24/2007 9:36:15 AM PDT by
nyconse
To: mvpel
F-ing brats need to learn to keep their hands to themselves. Why is something that would result in criminal charges in the workplace just pooh-poohed when it takes place in government schools? Just to update you, criminal charges were filed against the *boys.
*some* of the "pooh-pooh" to the story are the *girls* who admitted to "butt slapping" the boys faced NO CHARGES.
40 posted on
07/24/2007 9:41:03 AM PDT by
txdoda
(Voters to Gov't .......Re: post 9-11 Border Security....... ""The results are Unacceptable."")
To: mvpel
“F-ing brats need to learn to keep their hands to themselves. Why is something that would result in criminal charges in the workplace just pooh-poohed when it takes place in government schools?” Bankrupting these kids families and ruining these kids lives is Pooh Poohing to you? sheesh... You are as bad as Berry and Nifong. What is wrong with you?
47 posted on
07/24/2007 9:47:30 AM PDT by
monday
To: mvpel
F-ing brats need to learn to keep their hands to themselves. Why is something that would result in criminal charges in the workplace just pooh-poohed when it takes place in government schools? Their names are now Googleable forever. They'll be lucky to ever get a job in a workplace that does not involve a chain gang.
52 posted on
07/24/2007 9:53:54 AM PDT by
hunter112
(Change will happen when very good men are forced to do very bad things.)
To: mvpel
It wouldn’t result in criminal charges in the workplace. NOW said that the first grope is “free” when they defended Bill Clinton.
57 posted on
07/24/2007 9:58:41 AM PDT by
weegee
(NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
To: mvpel
Your response tells me you have some real serious mental issues. And please don’t whine in return. Just pathetic! What a confused person. A member of the of the Free State Project who thinks the childish behavior of some 11 year old kids is the problem and not the INSANE GOVERNMENT OVERREACHING and INTRUSION!!!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson