Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee

So I have to assume you were on the grand jury and heard all the facts? Or maybe you were there at the hospital, working in 100 degree heat and 90 percent humidity? Perhaps you were a doctor there and knew the history of these patients and the protocol for treating them?


242 posted on 07/26/2007 5:49:20 AM PDT by gracesdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gracesdad
See my post #163 and the articles linked at the beginning of this thread. The reason this case became known at all is because the doctor was reported to have admitted to euthanizing these patients by giving them lethal doses of narcotics. Her only excuse was that it was the compassionate thing to do and that they would have died anyway.

As far as I know, she never disavowed having said what she was quoted to have said. If you were reported to have said that you did that and you did not, wouldn’t you speak out? I know that I would.

Do you agree that if the doctor did what she was reported to have admitted that she had done, that it would be wrong, that it would be murder?

245 posted on 07/26/2007 5:56:08 AM PDT by Iwo Jima ("Close the border. Then we'll talk.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson