Replies

Since Pou is both a plaintiff and a defendant, and possibly a public figure who'll be able sell a good story to pay her legal bills...if I were a lawyer, I'd like to have her business. The medical establishment has come out on her side, the lefties are scattering...she has the affection of a lot of her community from what I'm googling...looks promising.

I'm a lawyer and I would not take her business. But then I have ethical standards. And I know that a jury will not go for what she's selling.

Answer these questions for me:

Did they administer lethal doses of drugs or not? Yes or no?

Did these lethal doses of drugs cause the patients' death? Yes or no?

Were these lethal doses of drugs given in order to cause or hasten death? Yes or no?

Was there a lack of consent from the patients to use lethal doses of drugs? Yes or no? (I suppose that some were unable to consent due to their condition.)

If the answer to these questions is "yes," then I call it murder, not matter what justification the doctor has about how horrible the conditions were.