http://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/NorthAmerica_TF_final.pdf
The document is seventy pages but worth reading. Some of the things that the CFR strongly recommends...
Eliminate the two borders by allowing free (as in unencumbered) access for employment among the three countries. IOW...no such thing as an illegal immigrant from Mexico.
Open roads for carriers. IOW...a trucker from Guadalajara could drive his truck unquestioned throughout the three nations.
Create a 'super fund' to address Mexican poverty. IOW...a 'Great Society' for Mexico paid for by US.
Off-border processing for cargo. IOW...an 'inland port' like the one designed for KC/MO.
Create a travel pass for foreigners whose credentials would be checked only at the first point of entry. IOW...A low-paid, uneducated, corruptable Mexican Customs agent in Guadalaraja would be our only line of defense.
Create a working SPP by 2010.
There's more but these alone should give you chills and should quiet those who think that any reference to the CFR planning a NAU is nothing but conspiracy nut-job talk.
“There’s more but these alone should give you chills and should quiet those who think that any reference to the CFR planning a NAU is nothing but conspiracy nut-job talk.”
Come on. A task force report is, to quote the CFR itself:
“Once formed, Task Forces are independent. Task Force chairs, directors, and members.”
http://www.cfr.org/about/what_we_do/task_forces.html
As shown in my previous post (the one with the links), many of the other members virulently disagree with the task force report.
Don’t be afraid of the marketplace of ideas -— conservative thought always rises to the top -— because it is correct.
I left off the rest of the CFR quote:
“Task Force chairs, directors, and members are solely responsible for the content of their reports.”