Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kimberly GG
You are right, you have exposed us. Jim created this board just to trap you loony Conservatives. He is really an ad hoc member of the CFR, has not only supported but personally will pave the Tran-America highway and is a life member of the Illuminati.

Now if you want serious. The CFR is an organization. So is Yale. So is Wal mart. They do indeed have some very powerful members, and by virtue of that have significant influence. But in the final analysis, all proposals for any changes in our nations laws and sovereignty have to come in front of the voters and their representatives.

I know this is tough, but just relax, I am going to hit you with something. There are members of the CFR that do not support the entire agenda if any of it at all. IT IS BIPARTSIAN. It is a gathering of the minds.

Does that mean these folks don’t support certain parts of developing an open trading system, no. There are Capitalist Conservatives and Libertarian Conservatives and Short Conservatives and Tall Conservatives (and fat Conservatives, a position for which I am over qualified).

Just because we may not like the sound of something does not mean it is bad and just because something is being proposed does not mean it will happen.

If Fred Thompson has a position in the NAU argument, it could be that it is just that, a position, on that may be supported by capitalist ideas. Maybe he likes a few items that can work as long as they are in line with Federalist principles.

110 posted on 07/26/2007 6:42:56 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (Fred Thompson has cooties, neener neener neener...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: ejonesie22

“There are members of the CFR that do not support the entire agenda if any of it at all.”

“Just because we may not like the sound of something does not mean it is bad and just because something is being proposed does not mean it will happen.”

“If Fred Thompson has a position in the NAU argument, it could be that it is just that, a position, on that may be supported by capitalist ideas. Maybe he likes a few items that can work as long as they are in line with Federalist principles.”

I’m afraid if you’re going to agree that the agenda exists, we’ll be passing you the tinfoil!

“But in the final analysis, all proposals for any changes in our nations laws and sovereignty have to come in front of the voters and their representatives.” I agree. But that is not what’s happening. The CFR agenda for the creation of a North American Union is a threat to the sovereignty and security of our country and should be scrapped.


119 posted on 07/26/2007 7:02:32 AM PDT by Kimberly GG (DUNCAN HUNTER '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson