I profoundly disagree with any sort of impeachment proceedings for President Bush.
It’s his job, he is doing it a manner he thinks is best for America, I disagree with how he is doing his job, but that is not a reason to impeach a President.
A Veto override is sufficient for me at least, my gut tells me it is only a political grandstanding opportunity anyway, the Dems are no more serious about securing the border then Jorge’ is, on this he is no more a Republican then Pelosi is.
I do see it as reasonable grounds for impeachment, but I don’t think, in view of the political landscape, that it would be a good thing for the country to actually do it. Much as I’d like to fix his wagon, I know that would be self destructive.
I don’t find that the argument “he is doing what he thinks best” holds any water. His intentions have no bearing on it. It’s what he does that matters. Some men beat their wives because they sincerely believe it is the best thing for them.
Anyway, with these people, I’ll believe they mean it *after* it actually happens. Proof, not promises. It so much like dealing with an alcoholic. When they are in trouble, oh the sobs and rending of garments. And the promises. Then as soon as you are placated, it starts all over agin.