Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A petrol that thinks it’s a diesel
Cartoday.com ^ | 25 July 2007 | Unknown

Posted on 07/26/2007 1:48:20 PM PDT by decimon

If you’re one of those people who like the frugality of diesels, but cannot bear to move away from petrol engined motoring Mercedes-Benz may well have developed a combined technology engine that will answer your prayers.

The Stuttgart company’s DiesOtto concept (named after Rudolph Diesel father of the oil-burner and Nicolaus Otto, German inventor of the internal combustion engine) is being touted as the first feasible mass production petrol engine that combines the fuel economy and torque of a modern diesel engine with improved emissions. Herbert Kohler, Mercedes-Benz head of group research and advanced engineering vehicle and powertrain and DaimlerChrysler's chief environmental officer remarked that due to the market enthusiasm for diesels and conventional gas engines, the company is "giving our attention to both engine types — including a full hybrid option for diesel and gasoline vehicles."<

The initial concept is a small capacity (1,8-litre) four-cylinder petrol engine that features such technologies as direct petrol injection, turbocharging and variable compression. This engine also utilises a technology called “controlled auto-ignition”. Kohler describes this technology as a “highly efficient combustion process similar to that of a diesel.”

Basically, the engine makes use of a sparkles ignition system when load conditions are low, an reverts to a spark plug ignition system for cold starts and heavy engine load conditions.

Volkswagen is also attempting to develop an engine using similar technology to the DiesOtto, but where this unit will only run on a synthetic fuel, the Benz concept can run effectively on both synthetic fuel and normal petroleum.

According to Kohler, this powerplant will return a fuel consumption figure of less than 6 l/100 km, and that’s with the unit being bolted to a vehicle the size of the current S-Class. Before you wince at the idea of a 1,8-litre mill powering a car the size of Benz’s flagship model, bear in mind that the DiesOtto is capable of delivering a respectable 175 kW and 400 N.m of torque.

It has also been suggested that the engineers at Mercedes-Benz may be able to extract even better fuel economy from this engine by adding hybrid technology that integrates a starter-generator attached to the flywheel.

The company has not yet given a firm schedule for the launch of this technology, stating that “the new drive concept is a feasible proposition in the midterm.”


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: energy; environment; transportation
175kw = 235 HP

400N.m. = 295 lb/ft

6 l/100 km = 39.2 MPG

How heavy is a current S-Class?

1 posted on 07/26/2007 1:48:23 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: decimon

I’ll bet that “sparkles ignition system” looks really snazzy, especially at night!


2 posted on 07/26/2007 1:56:44 PM PDT by Tarantulas ( Illegal immigration - the trojan horse that's treated like a sacred cow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarantulas

Surely better than the farkles system it replaces.


3 posted on 07/26/2007 1:59:54 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: decimon
"The Stuttgart company’s DiesOtto concept"

Didn't we already have one of those:


4 posted on 07/26/2007 2:00:18 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Confidence in Congress has hit an all-time low of 14%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
the engine makes use of a sparkles ignition system


5 posted on 07/26/2007 2:03:46 PM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Arranging...chairs...Titanic.

I know we need to stretch the fossil fuel thing out, but I’m getting a little nervous that we’re clinging to a dying technology with no single energy source being promising enough to take over when the price of fossil fuel exceeds most people’s ability to pay.

There’s the promise of nuclear power plants and electric cars using some future battery technology, but it takes 10 years to build a nuke due to regulations and protests.

We’re going to regulate and protest ourselves into the stone age.


6 posted on 07/26/2007 2:07:25 PM PDT by Hazwaste (Now with added lemony freshness!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarantulas
I’ll bet that “sparkles ignition system” looks really snazzy, especially at night!

Dr. Sparkles looks snazzy anytime!


7 posted on 07/26/2007 2:09:01 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

you must be older than dirt.


8 posted on 07/26/2007 2:10:42 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky (ill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: decimon

A combination spark-ignition/Diesel engine was actually built by International Harvester back in the late 1940’s, and installed on the Farmall “M” series tractor. The design was a switch between gasoline spark-ignition, on which the engine was started up, then, while running, a lever was engaged that pushed a slide-through casting that effectively reduced the volume of the combustion chamber, raising the compression ratio, sealing off the spark plug, and starting the injection pump on the Diesel operation. The sealed-off spark plug was switched off from firing, and the engine went on full Diesel operation. The original reasoning was that Diesels were notoriously hard to start from cold, and took a HUGE starter motor, using about 24 volts, to get the first charge ignited on the Diesel. This compromise made it possible to start the engine with a 6-volt system, or a hand crank if necessary, then enjoy the virtues of higher thermodynamic efficiency once the engine was running.

There never were very many of these old “MD” semi-Diesels around, as they were a pretty finicky piece of machinery. But when they ran right, they could beat the gasoline model for pulling power and relative fuel economy under load.


9 posted on 07/26/2007 2:17:18 PM PDT by alloysteel (Never attribute to ignorance that which is adequately explained by stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hazwaste
Liquid fuels are the easiest to deliver, cheapest to run and most abundant resource for transportation available today and will stay that way for many decades. The source of the liquids may gradually change. Some countries will take another direction entirely based on their location or other competitive advantage. Some portion of our commuter activity may switch to battery power if enough nuclear power units come up.
10 posted on 07/26/2007 2:22:39 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hazwaste

I wouldn’t argue with what you’re saying but coercion (regulation) is not the germ or gist of the article.

I’d love a part-electric auto engine and mostly if I could use a ‘proximity charger’ rather than a plug-in.


11 posted on 07/26/2007 3:01:40 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
Looks like a 1950 DeSoto Custom. My grandfather had a blue one. The hood ornament was a little chrome Hernando DeSoto head in a helmet.
12 posted on 07/26/2007 3:20:09 PM PDT by Tarantulas ( Illegal immigration - the trojan horse that's treated like a sacred cow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: decimon
1.8 liter engine, 235 hp? I wonder what rpm and how many inches of pressure they use.

I would be willing to bet that if they let me put it on my dyno the hp wouldn’t be any better than 150 or so. Now if it is turbocharged and running 9000 rpm, maybe.

13 posted on 07/26/2007 4:10:45 PM PDT by LeGrande (Muslims, Jews and Christians all believe in the same God of Abraham.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LeGrande
1.8 liter engine, 235 hp?

It's the sparkles. ;-)

14 posted on 07/26/2007 4:19:57 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

Actualy the concept was used throughout the IH line during the 40’s & 50’s. They made in addition to the farmall M versions, I believe about 40 drawbar HP, equal to the W-6,a W-9, and tracked versions TD-9, and TD 14. They also made stationary versions for pumps and Generators. They were easy to start in cold weather.
Didnt the military have a multi fuel engine that used the same system in the 70’s
barbra ann


15 posted on 07/26/2007 6:54:46 PM PDT by barb-tex (Why replace the IRS with anything?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LeGrande

I had 185hp at the wheels with my 2000 1.8Turbo GTI.

And I was on the low side of some of them. 250,300,350 was not uncommon.


16 posted on 07/26/2007 6:56:02 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (No buy China!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
I had one of those engines in an old TD-6 crawler. Not a bad engine. It was an improvement over Cat’s pony motor setup where you had to start a two cyl. gas engine and then engage the gas engine to start the diesel engine.
17 posted on 07/26/2007 7:26:02 PM PDT by Colorado Doug (Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: barb-tex
Didnt the military have a multi fuel engine that used the same system in the 70’s

Yes, I think you're right.

18 posted on 07/26/2007 7:29:24 PM PDT by Colorado Doug (Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici
I had 185hp at the wheels with my 2000 1.8Turbo GTI.
And I was on the low side of some of them. 250,300,350 was not uncommon.

I will let you in on a little secret ^_^ They show what is called corrected hp. Basically they add in a huge fudge factor to compensate for the transmission, drive train, alternator, water pump, exhaust, intake, mechanical friction, etc.

When I do dyno runs, I calibrate the machine and compensate for altitude and temperature, period.

Normally aspirated a 1.8 L engine is apx. a 100 hp engine, at a reasonable rpm. If you boost it a lot, 180 to 200 is possible. And yes if you add intercoolers, nitro, tuned exhaust, etc. etc., you can probably even get up to 500 hp and it may last long enough to make it to the end of the quarter mile.

Take hp claims with a grain of salt.

19 posted on 07/26/2007 10:12:56 PM PDT by LeGrande (Muslims, Jews and Christians all believe in the same God of Abraham.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson