Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The unintended consequences of the ethanol quick fix
Christian Science Monitor ^ | July 27, 2007 | Ray Nothstine

Posted on 07/26/2007 5:46:51 PM PDT by PJ-Comix

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last
To: Nathan Zachary

Variable compression, variable injection engines will perform better with ethanol; ordinary engines will have less power and poorer mileage.


61 posted on 07/27/2007 8:52:37 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

A 1950’s vintage naturally aspirated long stroke Offenhauser makes an ideal ethanol friendly engine.


62 posted on 07/27/2007 9:05:36 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

You don’t seem to have any experience with logic from what I can tell.


63 posted on 07/27/2007 10:17:18 AM PDT by xcamel ("It's Talk Thompson Time!" >> irc://irc.freenode.net/fredthompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
Oh please.

Don't make bizarre allegations if you don't want to be called on them.

64 posted on 07/27/2007 10:38:09 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
What I'm looking forward to is the screams of outrage about how the move to E85 and even ethanol as a fuel is increasing the greenhouse gasses, contributing to even greater "global warming!"

A lot of people don't realize that there's less energy in ethanol than in gasoline, and consequently, you burn more of it to produce the same work in an internal combustion engine. The more you burn, the greater the exhaust.

Mark

65 posted on 07/27/2007 10:57:28 AM PDT by MarkL (Listen, Strange women lyin' in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
They're not allegations - they are facts - and even the most basic search would prove it to anyone who would bother to look. Diverting any quantity of basic commodity food products to fuel production is about the stupidest thing any society can do, not to mention disastrous to the economy.
66 posted on 07/27/2007 11:37:32 AM PDT by xcamel ("It's Talk Thompson Time!" >> irc://irc.freenode.net/fredthompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

What nutrients do you think are removed from corn used as ethanol feedstock?


67 posted on 07/27/2007 11:39:00 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1861790/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1861233/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1859974/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1858095/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1857162/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1852378/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1850059/posts

Start reading....

And Yes, sugar, and starch, and name even one common food product not effected by the price of corn — I bet you can’t.


68 posted on 07/27/2007 11:50:35 AM PDT by xcamel ("It's Talk Thompson Time!" >> irc://irc.freenode.net/fredthompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
Lettuce. Beans. Celery. Watermelons. Potatoes. Asparagus. Pancakes. Bread. Noodles. Raspberry cobler. Pumpkin pie. You get the idea.

Have you told us yet how much corn you think a dairy cow eats in a day?

69 posted on 07/27/2007 12:04:13 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

I have used union 76 for years that does contain ethanol. I use it because Calif has MTBE in all the other gas and that stuff is deadly on the water systems let alone our lungs. I have not really found any problems accept that my fuel pump in my truck gas tank started to not hold pressure.


70 posted on 07/27/2007 12:08:47 PM PDT by jetson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

6 of the 10 products you mentioned use corn starch, corn oil, or sweeteners in normal commercial production.

(summer) lactating dairy cows.
Feeds lbs./cow/day
Alfalfa silage 10.00
Corn silage 50.00
Shelled corn 10.00

Now I’m done with you.


71 posted on 07/27/2007 12:13:59 PM PDT by xcamel ("It's Talk Thompson Time!" >> irc://irc.freenode.net/fredthompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
Now I'm done with you

And I'll be done with you (right after this post of course).

The USDA reports the average retail price of whole milk in the City of Indianapolis (my state capitol) this July to be $3.80 per gallon. At 8 gallons per cow, ole Bessie produces $30.40 per day in retail product. The cost to the dairyman, at today's CBOT close, for the corn fed to Bessie today was $.57

72 posted on 07/27/2007 12:25:39 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Corn planting is up 19% this year from last year. We will be up to our @sses in corn. It won’t affect food prices at all.

The whole story is a yawner.


73 posted on 07/27/2007 12:40:19 PM PDT by TexanToTheCore (If it ain't Rugby or Bullriding, it's for girls.........................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

I am still looking for the consensus of scientist who say a CO2 molecule from ethanol is better for global warming reduction than a CO2 molecule from gasoline. Gotta be some reason for this stupidity.


74 posted on 07/27/2007 12:42:56 PM PDT by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Racer1
you said, "Its not the farmers reaping the benefits as much as the retail food stores."

the middle men can raise the price and the consumer doesn't see it. Farmers work hard for their money, and nobody gives them credit for being productive....but non farmers can sure look down their collective noses at farmers and ridicule them as being country hicks.., and then they complain if the farmer makes a buck or two......sheesh.

75 posted on 07/27/2007 1:00:15 PM PDT by Auntie Toots (The GOP is still the best we've got.....AND THAT USED TO BE THE TRUTH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: padre35
As far as "Govt intervention in a market"...imagine this....

National retail sales tax

A real free market

A government only as large and intrusive as enumerated in the Constitution without the 16th or 17th amendments

An educated society because government has nothing to do with education. Everyone fails or succeeds on their own merit

My idea of "Utopia".

Which I guess means no government intervention except when enforcing objective laws.
76 posted on 07/27/2007 1:13:24 PM PDT by BabsC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Intolerant in NJ

The yield in ethanol per acre varies form 330 to 440 gallons.


77 posted on 07/27/2007 1:34:17 PM PDT by TexanToTheCore (If it ain't Rugby or Bullriding, it's for girls.........................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky; xcamel

As a farmer who sells feed (high-test alfalfa hay) to California dairies, here’s the secret of what causes milk prices to go up/down the most:

The numbers of fresh cows in milking parlors. Period, end of discussion. Feed prices aren’t the driving factor.

When the dairymen control the number of springers they’re going to bring on-line, they can keep milk prices high.

When the dairymen see high milk prices, they start raising a lot of heifers to add to their lines, and when those heifers drop, then they crater milk prices, usually within three to six months.

It’s the old saying: Show the American farmer a profit, and he’ll rather quickly show you a surplus.

Milk prices have been higher than they are now very recently. Matter of fact, it was only back in 2002/2003 that Class I milk was up at over $19/cwt in the CA market.

The price then promptly crashed downwards to about $10 to $11/cwt for 18 months, because too many dairy farmers expanded cow numbers too fast.

Last summer’s heat wave took out quite a few cows in the southwest, so dairy prices started going back up. The dairy co-ops started encouraging farmers to not replace milkers as they were culled in the last year, so they’ve re-established some profitable price levels for fluid Class I and Class III milk.

The price of the feed going into the TMR rations for milkers is a very small component of any increase in milk prices. Matter of fact, I can tell you what happens when there is an abundance of milk (and low fluid milk prices) and dent corn or corn silage prices go up: hay prices go down, because the dairy farmers try to screw the hay farmers out of pricing power for alfalfa hay as long as there is surplus hay out there.

Only when they got the number of milkers and replacements down to a point where they quit dumping milk at $10/cwt into the market did the price of milk start going up again.

BTW — as the price of corn goes up, you should see what the California dairymen substitute into their TMR’s: beet pulp, pumpkins, silage soybean mush, DDG’s, you name it. It is pretty humorous to watch .... unless you’re a hay farmer.


78 posted on 07/27/2007 1:39:29 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon

It is the source of the carbon that is at issue.

When you burn a gallon of crude oil, you’re liberating carbon that had previously been sequestered in the ground.

When you burn a gallon of ethanol or biodiesel, you’re liberating carbon from plant material, that is then re-sequestered in next year’s crop, and then re-liberated, etc, etc.

The point of bio-fuels is that the act of growing the bio-fuel feedstock takes CO2 out of the air and puts it into carbon in the plant matter, only some of which is then harvested and re-released back into the atmosphere.

With oil/natural gas/coal — the carbon is released, never to be completely re-captured.


79 posted on 07/27/2007 1:42:22 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Ethanol production has caused corn based livestock feed to go from $4.00 per 100# a year ago to $8.50 per 100# now. We are seeing this in the cost of meat, eggs, dairy products, anything that uses corn oil, or corn syrup and even canned corn and corn on the cob. Besides that, it’s more expensive than the gasoline that it is supposed to replace.
This has to rank up there with global warming as one of the stupidest things that has ever been perpetrated on the American public.


80 posted on 07/27/2007 1:50:45 PM PDT by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson