I do. No conviction, no loss of property. It's the constitutional concept that matters, not the particular crime.
you said it better than i did ...
unfortunately some folks here don’t think the Constitution applies to certain “undesirables”
It is a controversial issue I agree and the point is well taken,but it has been around for years now I assume the ACLU types have given it a close eye and decided it would pass a challenge. Anything they can do to make life miserable for a drug dealer is good. I do however admit that it could and probably has been used inappropriately, sadly this is not unique to this law.