The solution seems straightforward enough: outlaw dowries.
Or turn it around and require the groom's family to pay a bride price. (I suspect that will happen on its own, as marriageable girls become scarce.)
Except in this case, it doesn’t sound like there was any financial burden.
The practice of bride price also existed in India, where it was considered as a social evil and the subject of a movement to eradicate it in the early 20th Century. Unlike what happened in the case of dowry, this movement was largely successful, although it has been making a comeback in recent years due to an increasing shortage of women.
The free market will correct things in less than a generation. Part of it also comes from Indian inheritance laws, where sons and daughters do not get an equal share, which leads to families giving daughters their inheritance in advance in the form of a dowry.
The government of Maharashtra State in India has recently passed a law designed to promote gender equity in property inheritance and discourage the practice of dowry-giving. The law provides for the right of a daughter to inherit parents' wealth on an equal basis with sons. Until this law was implemented in Maharashtra, daughters did not have the legal right to claim an equal share of an inheritance because of a loophole in national law. In most cases they had to be content with a dowry.Dowry is officially supposed to represent a daughter's share of her family's wealth, in the form of a pre-mortem inheritance from her parents at the time of her marriage. Dowry is also given by the parents of a daughter to compensate the groom's family for supporting her after her marriage, since she is often prohibited by social customs from earning a cash income that would contribute economically to the family into which she is married. Women may also become an economic burden in the event of widowhood, which is likely since brides are typically much younger than grooms.
However, dowry has deteriorated into a method of extortion of wealth from bride's to groom's parents, leaving many parents of daughters in debt and encouraging the practice of female feticide - an increasing social evil in the state of Maharashtra, as elsewhere in India. This practice occurs as a result of great social pressure on parents to arrange socially acceptable marriages for their daughters without having the economic means to do so.
Simply passing a law equalising sons' and daughters' claims to land and other immovable property will not solve the problem of dowry-giving. In many regions of rural India there is a strict social taboo on a daughter inheriting land, since if she does so the land is lost by her father's lineage and passes instead to her children, who belong to the lineage of her husband. Furthermore, women in many rural areas are economically reliant on male kin. If the woman is widowed without adult sons or brothers-in-law, and her dowry was small, or was seized by her husband's family, she may be unable to earn a self-supporting income and be forced to sell her land inheritance share to a complete stranger.
It does seem like a cultural time bomb waiting to go off. If women become fewer and fewer in the general population, obviously more and more men are required to remain without progeny.
I wonder why no family with marriageable daughters has thought about charging a groom dowry? I wonder how much longer? 10 years? 20 years?
The same thing is brewing in China as well.
Hey Planed Parenthood, There’s a gold mine in India just waiting for you to open your murder for money sewer.