Child welfare officials have no duty to parents: top court (Canada)

Child welfare officials have no duty to parents: top court

CBC News - Last Updated: Friday, July 27, 2007 | 12:07 PM ET

Child welfare authorities don't owe parents a duty of care, Canada's top court ruled Friday, saying such an obligation would put the treatment of children at risk by creating a conflict of duties.

The unanimous Supreme Court of Canada ruling marks the end of a lengthy battle by a southwestern Ontario family for millions of dollars in damages.

They claimed a treatment centre and social worker owed them a responsibility and had been negligent by depriving them of a relationship with their daughter.

But the court ruling found there can be no dual responsibility because it would hinder the care of the children. The system's paramount duty is to do what is best for the child, the ruling says.

"To recognize such a legal duty to the family of a child in their care would pose a real risk that a secure treatment centre and its employees would have to compromise their overriding duty to the child," the ruling says.

In 1995, the family's 14-year-old daughter, identified in the case as R.D., was taken from their custody after she wrote a short story for school claiming her parents sexually and physically abused her.

The parents claimed the allegations were false and that she had a history of mental illness. No criminal charges were ever laid and the case never went to trial.

The family filed a lawsuit against a case worker and the treatment centre asking for $40 million in damages.

The suit alleged the centre treated R.D. as if she were a sex abuse victim even though she wasn't and failed to try to reintegrate the teen into her family.

They argued the interference caused them emotional distress and nervous shock for having been deprived of a relationship with the girl.

The girl had been sent to a facility for mentally disturbed teens, the Syl Apps Secure Treatment Centre, after three suicide attempts. She later agreed to become a ward of the state, despite her parents' objections.

When the family filed the lawsuit, Syl Apps tried to have it tossed out. In 2006, the Ontario Court of Appeal quashed their attempt and the treatment centre and social worker then appealed to the Supreme Court.

Precisely why the Supreme Court's latest elite decision above amounts yet another unconscionable attack on Canadian children & their families & further institutionalizes CAS non-accountability.
Two more 'Reviews' will no more constitute legitimate justice for abused & murdered children when it comes to the child protection industry's habitual dereliction of duty than did any of the countless others conducted over the years all across Canada.
However, jailing proven negligent social workers coupled with massive financial awards against their employers would be a great start!

CHARGES AGAINST CAREGIVER UPGRADED IN DEATH OF BOY, 2
Winnipeg Free Press, Saturday, July 28, 2007

WINNIPEG -A caregiver has been charged with manslaughter in the death of a two-year old boy found badly beaten last week, say Winnipeg police. The charge against Shirley Guimond, 52, was upgraded yesterday; she was in custody on charges of criminal negligence causing bodily harm and assault causing bodily harm. Ms. Guimond was arrested July 20 after the boy was taken to hospital. A 911 dispatch call reported the child fell down a flight of stairs at Ms. Guimond's home, but police allege he was a victim of child abuse. Witnesses reported seeing the boy removed from the home covered with bruises. The boy died Sunday of his injuries, which police have described as "extensive" and too upsetting to detail. The death has sparked two reviews -- one by the Sagkeeng Child and Family Services and the other by the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner. The little boy was placed in Ms. Guimond's care about six weeks ago, said neighbours. Before that, he had spent about a year with a foster family. (source)

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.