Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: imahawk
Note the real reason for this "prosecution." Follow the money. The poor slob had assets that totaled over 1/2 a million bucks and the State used its confiscatory authority to snatch it. His home and business were easy money to fill the coffers of law enforcement which is constantly being underfunded by the liberal legislatures. A State must have enough money to fund social welfare programs, the infrastructure be damned.

The poor slob in this case was a perfect victim - former criminal record, small amount of marijuana, disposable/accessible assets...

12 posted on 07/29/2007 7:37:38 AM PDT by Thommas (The snout of the camel is in the tent..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Thommas

That sucks, if he sues,the taxpayers pay for it.He is justified to sue imo,I just wish the guy could sue the prosecutor(POS)


13 posted on 07/29/2007 1:44:31 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Thommas

Typically, one doesn’t even need to file criminal charges in order to seize assets, and keep them. Asset seizure is a civil matter and requires a preponderance of evidence rather than beyond a reasonable doubt as is required for a criminal coviction.


19 posted on 07/31/2007 6:30:34 AM PDT by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson