Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: saganite

I think you’re right about the no evasive zig-zagging,assuming no subs turned out to be a costly mistake.If only there had been one destroyer with her-they could have saved a whole lot of lives.


7 posted on 07/29/2007 5:38:38 AM PDT by Farmer Dean (That was a hell of a thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Farmer Dean
As I recall the Japanese sub also carried a few kamikaze torpedo pilots but the commander decided he didn’t need to make use of them because the shooting conditions were so good.
11 posted on 07/29/2007 5:47:14 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Farmer Dean; saganite
At McVay's courtmartial the Japanese skipper was asked if it would have made a difference if the Indianapolis would have been zig-zagging. He said 'No'.

Some surface ships, like this cruiser, had such speed that it was felt that zig zagging was unnecessary under certain conditions. IIRC, the cruiser was running in & out of storm fronts & so ceased zig zagging for safety reasons -- I could be wrong on that point.

Submerged submarines were generally too slow to get into firing position once detecting such a ship unless they got lucky. OTOH, if the sub was running surfaced, where it would be faster, the firing solution would be easier.

All that being said, Japanese I-boats were some of the fastest subs around in WW2. They were designed to keep pace with our battleline and attrite it prior to a big gun battle.

17 posted on 07/29/2007 6:06:33 AM PDT by Tallguy (Climate is what you plan for, weather is what you get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson