Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dwhole2th
It represents a danger because it presents psuedoscience as real. Some people will actually believe what is presented as true science and that isn’t a good thing.

I can’t understand why fundamental Christians need to invent any sort of science. Why isn’t faith enough?

They can't combat the science, so they frequently resort to misrepresentation, quote mining, and outright falsehoods.

The transcript of the Dover trial, especially the testimony of some of the witnesses, showed this clearly. Behe, finally under oath, had to admit that ID was not science; he admitted that if the definition of science was changed enough to admit ID then astrology was also "science." Other witnesses were caught lying under oath! Its all in the transcript.

27 posted on 07/29/2007 4:26:36 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman

the Dover trial was nothing but judicial activism run amuck.


28 posted on 07/29/2007 4:28:08 PM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson