To: ECM
I'd say the first step should be to maximize the level of surveillance performed on law-enforcement personnel. To be sure, most cops are good most of the time, but footage of cops' actions would reduce the need to rely upon their word.
Besides--if they're not doing anything wrong, what should they be afraid of?
2 posted on
07/29/2007 5:43:16 PM PDT by
supercat
(Sony delenda est.)
To: supercat
Next step would be surveillance camera’s in all elected officials and judges offices, cars and homes. They shouldn’t mind if they have nothing to hide. /sarc
18 posted on
07/29/2007 6:09:46 PM PDT by
Kozak
To: supercat
No, the first step should be to up the level of surveillance on each and every politician, at every level of government. Put them under the microscope 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
23 posted on
07/29/2007 6:19:43 PM PDT by
AFreeBird
(Will NOT vote for Rudy. <--- notice the period)
To: supercat
I'd say the first step should be to maximize the level of surveillance performed on law-enforcement personnel..
The first thing that happens to folks recording cops on voice or video is they get beat up. Then they get arrested.
To: supercat
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson