Replies

To: blam

50,000 years ago? What a bunch of nonsense. Again, 44,000 years off.

5 posted on 07/29/2007 11:44:51 PM PDT by Fred-n-Hunter08

To: Fred-n-Hunter08

Welcome to FR. Is your other name, “Ken Ham”?

6 posted on 07/29/2007 11:55:36 PM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)

To: Fred-n-Hunter08

What a bunch of nonsense.

I don't know. I found some stuff in the back of the fridge that might be that old.

7 posted on 07/30/2007 12:25:03 AM PDT by A_Tradition_Continues (THE NEXT GENERATION CONSERVATIVE)

To: Fred-n-Hunter08

“50,000 years ago? What a bunch of nonsense. Again, 44,000 years off.”

You might ask God to give you a new caclulator - yours appears to be broke.

13 posted on 07/30/2007 12:27:31 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea

To: Fred-n-Hunter08

“50,000 years ago? What a bunch of nonsense. Again, 44,000 years off.”

You might ask God to give you a new caclulator - yours appears to be broke.

14 posted on 07/30/2007 12:27:41 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea

To: Fred-n-Hunter08

Four total posts so far and half of them to try to tell us the Earth if only 6,000 years old.

I’m still not buyin’ it.

16 posted on 07/30/2007 12:32:59 PM PDT by gracesdad

To: Fred-n-Hunter08

This is an paleoanthropology thread. Non-scientific comments should be restricted to art critique.

23 posted on 07/31/2007 8:01:58 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794