[from occupied ga]

What you are advocating for is an guaranteed entitlement for Paris Hilton

I don't recall advocating anything. Maybe you can show me. For the hard of understanding (that would seem to be you) what I decried was the envious glee that PH was not going to get any inheritance from her grandfather - the "yeah yeah stick it to her!" attitude - that surprisingly many loser freepers show toward the rich. Kind of the same attitude that Hillary and Osama like to cultivate in their core supporters. As far as her grandfather spending his money that is obviously up to him, but I've noticed that most big "charities" with the exception of the salvation army either promote liberalism/socialism or like many faith based ones work to destroy our national integrity by encouraging illegal hispanic immigration.

[Pencil]

I see you've read Ann Coulter's teachings on how to debate like a liberal. Here's what you said:

Bull. Most charaties these days either support liberalism or poor life choices. (Unless the charity is supporting terrorism or criminal activity, that's the judgment for the donor to make, not you.) What is it about people on FR that like to see rich people get the shaft. (Mr. Hilton is not getting the shaft at all. He has no duty to Paris to provide anything for her.) Are they really no different than the envy driven supporters of the Dmocratic party. I like rich people. When I see a rich person I think that this shows that free enterprise is still alive (although somewhat ill) in the USA. If PH inherits money, then this shows that the greedy government hasn't been able to steal everything in generational transfers.