Posted on 07/30/2007 9:20:30 AM PDT by Kaslin
Huh? I know, strange concept - but let me explain.
In the United States, the percentage of the population under 5 years old is 7%. San Francisco? 5.5%. Manhattan? 4.9%. Key West? 4.7%. Beverly Hills? 3.7%. Malibu? 4.5%. West Hollywood? 1.6%. Vermont? 5.6%. Seattle? 5.9%. Marin County? 5.9%. Santa Monica? 5.4%.
So, as you can see, in our liberal bastions, you liberals just ain't having the number of kids you should have. I haven't been able to find the figures, but I'll bet a lot that in none of these jurisdictions - or anyplace else where liberal Demcorats do real well at election time - is the fertility rate 2.1% - which means each woman having, on average, 2.1 children over their life time. That is mere replacement rate - you don't grow, but you don't decline. if you aren't replacing yourselves, then you haven't got a future.
Now, some other stats - more population under 5 years old:
Salt Lake City? 8.9%. Las Vegas? 7.9%. Kansas City? 8.5%. Norfolk, VA? 9.6%. Palmdale, CA? 10.4%.
Getting the picture? The areas of the country which tend to vote heavily Republican are having kids - a lot more kids than you liberals are even thinking of having (and what is up with West Hollywood? I know there is a large gay community there - but isn't anyone doing heterosexual sex with a purpose out there?). Thing is, if you liberals out there keep voting for liberal politicians and by some weird set of circumstances get us to be like the Europeans - something you liberals seem to want - then you'll start to have us become enervated, just like they are, and in a short while we'll have as few children as they have in once-traditional but now liberal-soaked Italy...which is to say, hardly any at all. Since you aren't replacing yourselves, the only way for you to ensure that there is a liberal San Francisco in, say, 2050 is to selectively recruit someone else's kids to your worldview - which means you have to have kids to begin with, and only conservatives grounded in Judeo-Christian values do that sort of thing...unless, of course, you want to import the most fertile people in the world, Moslems...but having America become majority Moslem might not bode well for the annual Gay Pride parade in San Francisco, huh?
All joking aside, the only way you can preserve the liberal lifestyle you love so much is to continue to have it piggyback on a Judeo-Christian, conservative society. We're willing to do the heavy lifting (all that being in the police force, joining the Army and generally doing the useful work while you're out getting a piercing and heading to the next Live Earth concert). But we can't do it alone - we need conservative Presidents and Congresses and Supreme Courts...all the things we need to defend traditional values against attempst to export Manhattan to Kansas City.
So, think carefully, liberals, when next you vote - a vote for Nancy Pelosi is a vote for liberal social suicide...a vote for a conservative means you'll get to keep your liberal paradise and continue to complain about how thickheaded we conservatives are.
Liberals are nominees for future Darwin Awards: they’re breeding themselves out of existence (or rather, not breeding themselves).
The third world is outbreeding the first world, too.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
LOL
You missed the memo, they’re importing all the liberals they need from South of the Border, Down Mexico Way. (Apologies to Patsy Cline.)
where have people been?
the u.s. government statisticians figured this out before 1965.
and ted kennedy was aware of it and pushed through the major change in the immigration laws, changing the focus from “racist” white folks in europe to third world countries.
Don’t even try to hijack my thread. There is nothing about immigration in the editorial. So either stay on subject or get off
Seems kind of funny, but then again when you think about it, that’s why the gays want to be able to promote their perversion in the public schools. They cannot reproduce, so they want to co-opt the public school system to promote their views to our unsuspecting children, lest they just die off.
Don’t even try to hijack my thread. There is nothing about immigration in the editorial. So either stay on subject or get off
______________________________________________________
To paraphrase Ann Coulter, you shouldn’t use immigration and hijack in the same sentence if you want to be taken seriously : ) . . . and the article is about demographics, which includes immigration as a factual matter.
Fortunately, much of Latin America, Africa and South and East Asia are showing significant reductions in population growth. THE exception, is of course the Muslim world. GO figure.
I see your point this ISN’T about immigration.
However it IS about liberals losing voters by not reproducing.
In this balance illegal IMMIGRATION DOES play an important role.
Take a trip to Anaheim Disneyland if you don’t believe it.
Immigrants will make up the difeerence. Thats why its so important to them to codify the whole shebang.
Nonsense, its easier just to buy replacements.
All the liberals I know were raised by conservative parents so I don’t think you can predict future voting patterns based on birth rates
All the liberals I know were raised by conservative parents so I don’t think you can predict future voting patterns based on birth rates
__________________________________________________________
That’s the reason for the left’s virtual monopoly on public education....your liberal friends had their conservatism “educated” right out of them and the result is progeny without the labor pains
The good news is that Christianity is spreading rapdily in the third-world, while in the west it is stagnant because all too many are compromisers.
don’t wet your panties,
no one is hijacking “your” thread.
this is a forum.
and, if you haven’t noticed birth rates are directly tied to immigration.
I’m not so sure that’s really good news. Bear in mind that third world Christianity is sometimes .. weird, EG the Lord’s Resistance Army and the like. They sometimes have these odd syntheses of the local rain-god and Jesus, you know? So I’m not so sure that having that stuff be the fastest growing, while our home-grown Christianity is “stagnating”, is such a good thing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.