Posted on 07/30/2007 1:24:37 PM PDT by r-q-tek86
SShhhh. Other liberal papers like the AJC might be forced into reporting this if it gets out that the nyt did it. :)
Damn! It must be going pretty damn good if the fishwrapper is reporting it.
If a Democrat is elected in 2008, as the NYT hopes, that Democratic President will have to face the grownup reality that we cannot simply leave Iraq on January 22, 2009.
The NYT is saying nowthat the Iraq can be won, so they can credibly claim that a Democrat actually won the war at some point in the future.
Spin: "After years of Republican mismanagement and failure, a progressive administration has figured out a way to win this war and bring our troops back home."
Hmmm. I wonder what their ulterior motive is. It can’t just be to tell the truth.
They’re (libs) prepping the political battlefield.
They know the facts in Iraq have not/never did support their bashing of Bush...so...they are laying the groundwork for a democratic presidential candidate who supported the war (before she didnt) to run...geeee...I wonder who that was...
We could have won this thing outright in about 2 years, maybe less, had our guys not been forced to fight with one hand tied behind their backs. I blame that directly on GWB.
But nobody in the White House gets this. And I mean nobody.
I’m waiting for the “If it weren’t for the pressure the Democratic congress put on the Iraqi people, we would not be seeing this progress.”
Well something is up in the MSM.The good news is maybe our troops can finish their mission. And Democrats are not operating out of a vacuum. They have intell or something that tells them the surge is working and they are CYA move here. Time will tell.
We have to get the public ready for the victory which is inevitable once the Democrats control the war.
Thus the all out push for defeat before September 15th?
What you said. Yep.
See Post #4.
60 second ad of the Democrats stating how the war is lost, interspersed with media headlines the war is lost.
End of commercial “Democrats and the Media are losers.”
then
“Republicans were for winning, before winning was cool”
Yeah, but it isn’t clear if “we” refers to Al-Qaeda or the U.S. Since it’s the NYT it’s safest to assume the former.
Dems know if they win the White House they are going to inherit this war, and won’t be able to play politics of blaming the republicans for the fact they aren’t withdrawing...
So now the spin will be, war is going better.... why we can’t leave etc etc...
Until election day, if an R wins the spin will go right back to we can’t win... if its a D, then well its obvious we are winning can’t quit now.
Amazing the group that has ZERO credibility at all can declare an adminstration has none....
Funny, seems to me the previous administration bald face lied to the american people.. not political rhetoric but bald face lied ... and you seemed to think they had credibility.
The MSM by and large is an abject joke.
The liberals play down the war, accept it is going well enough to be in the bag, then focus the American people on domestic issues.
War = Republican President in 08
Domestic Agenda = Democrat President in 08
Twilight Zone episode perhaps???....
Quick Quick ! Surrender now, before it’s too late!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.