Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/30/2007 7:31:09 PM PDT by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: traumer

My retirement fund lost 7K last week. I’m STILL crying!


73 posted on 07/30/2007 9:46:45 PM PDT by FrogMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: traumer

Where I am many, maybe most boomers I know have the same plan.. they are big in debt on a house and counting on home price appreciation for the next 10 years. Then they’ll all cash out and have enough to retire on.

The slight problem is they all have the same plan, and the younger generation doesn’t have much money.


80 posted on 07/30/2007 9:54:57 PM PDT by ran20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: traumer
I suspect that many of those 50-somethings with little savings have been in the same boat I am in.

I had some pretty good savings socked away in my forties. Then, after 9/11, the place I worked shut down.

It took me ten months to find a new job. I had a kid in college, but could not qualify for scholarship money because I had made too much money the year before. That had to be paid for, because you don’t want someone in their junior year with a 3.5 in engineering dropping out. (Well, maybe some freepers would make their kids drop out, but I would not.)

Guess what I lived on? Those savings. I went through most of them before finding that new job. And, no — we were not extravagant. We canceled plans for a 25th anniversary vacation and used the money for living expenses. We cut back our costs and dumped luxuries. The wife got a job and I looked after the kids. (We have two other kids, both at home then.) I worked odd jobs and consulted to bring in some extra cash.

But the week I started my new job, I emptied all but $500 out of my savings account to pay for the next month’s expenses. God knows what would have happened if I had been unemployed another two or three months — probably would have had to go deep in debt.

I am not complaining, just explaining. And only now, after five years, am I managing to build my savings up again. (We had to pay relocation expenses, and have another kid in college.) And I also know the job I have now will probably disappear before the end of 2011, and am planning to weather another storm then.

Actually my biggest fear is not having to put off retirement. I enjoy working and the job I do. My fear is ending up involuntarily retired at 55 or 56 when the current job ends. Employers are reluctant to take an “elderly” engineer — after all they will be retiring soon. (Never mind that a college recruit is just as likely to leave before five years are up.)

Assuming I am healthy, I would as soon keep working until I am 75 or so. (Why not? The work I do is fun, not physically demanding, and pays well. And I do good work.)

I can understand wanting to retire at 65 — or even 55 if you are in a dangerous, physically demanding work (puddling steel in a steel mill for example). But early retirement is unnecessary for those in an office environment.

145 posted on 07/31/2007 6:44:11 AM PDT by No Truce With Kings (The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: traumer

Every year I save & save - it just about covers my taxes. And I am not a boomer, born in ‘66. Socialism is stacked against those who play by the rules. Where’s my guv’mint tit?


150 posted on 07/31/2007 6:56:49 AM PDT by AD from SpringBay (We have the government we allow and deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: traumer
Well, of course they don't have any retirement! Don't you remember? The world owes them a living! Silly.
151 posted on 07/31/2007 7:23:31 AM PDT by TChris (The Republican Party is merely the Democrat Party's "away" jersey - Vox Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: traumer

It’s another boomer bashing thread. The bashing started in the third post.


154 posted on 07/31/2007 7:42:50 AM PDT by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: traumer
For one thing, Americans now must wait until they're older than 65 to collect full Social Security benefits...

Yeah, and that's because the "new welfare" is social security disability. Nothing's going to be left for the truely disabled, and nothing's going to be left for those who contributed a lifetime.

164 posted on 07/31/2007 3:17:49 PM PDT by GOPJ (Social Security Disability-the NEW WELFARE. They get "on" at 20- YOU work til you drop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: traumer

I don’t lack a retirement fund now. However, if this market meltdown continues...


170 posted on 08/01/2007 6:09:25 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: traumer

Our popcorn fart economy has to float on something, and it ain’t people saving their money.


171 posted on 08/01/2007 6:13:55 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson