Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

QUIRKY long shots Dennis Kucinich and RON PAUL stand TALL on Iraq
Baltimore Sun ^ | August 1, 2007 | Thomas F. Schaller

Posted on 08/01/2007 7:29:25 AM PDT by rface

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Kirkwood
Why does she have stains all over her dress and what looks like a hand print on her butt?

Kucinich believes that washing your hands is environmentally wasteful.

41 posted on 08/01/2007 10:28:27 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rface

Hmmm .... you have to wonder if Ron Paul can top that.


42 posted on 08/01/2007 10:31:12 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Says the poster who has quaffed deeply of Ron Paul's ninth-rate Kool Aid. The Gallic spelling of caliber is an interesting tell, thanks.

Gallic? Did you say Gallic?

Belgians For Ron Paul

A YouTube by BelgiansForRonPaul, a group of young Reaganite Belgians. I know. Belgians! (Belgium is about 40% French people hence the Gallic relevance.) Look at it and tell me that the Reagan magic is dead and incremental big-government is all we can hope for.

The question isn't why Ron Paul is offering this viral message that is gaining such support here and around the world. The question is why the other GOP candidates won't.

Dare to believe that Reagan was right, that Gingrich (despite his flaws) moved us in the right direction. And that that message can still win for us. In fact, it's the only thing that can win for us. Now is the time to re-ignite the old Reagan flame, whether it's Ron Paul or another GOP candidate.
43 posted on 08/01/2007 10:36:52 AM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: DreamsofPolycarp
How can you be so deliberately dishonest?

I'm in Bizarro world, where exposing the truth about Ron Paul gets me falsely accused of lying.

Fact: On 9/18/2001 Ron Paul voted yes on 107-40, the law pursuant to which we intervened in Afghanistan.

Fact: On 10/10/2001 Ron Paul introduced a bill for issuing letters of marque and reprisal against Al-Qaeda - in other words, proposing to downgrade al-Qaeda's atrocities from an act of war to an act of piracy and undermining the existing legal rationale for military deployment in Afghanistan.

Fact: For months before the Iraq War Authorization of 10/10/2002 Ron Paul spoke against going to war with Hussein.

Fact: One week before the Iraq War Authorization Ron Paul proposed a declaration of war against Hussein to the House.

Fact: After this redundant proposal was defeated, Paul voted against the Iraq War Authorization and denounced the intervention.

It's all a matter of record.

44 posted on 08/01/2007 10:41:54 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: rface
I think Kookcinich would be the best candidate for the Dems..
45 posted on 08/01/2007 10:48:50 AM PDT by newnhdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Indeed!!!


46 posted on 08/01/2007 10:50:15 AM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson