I didn’t say anything about having the nanny state force people to take the vaccine. I said I thought everyone should get this vaccine, and here’s more evidence why. But I’m sure posting is more fun for you if you can call me a moonbat and a liberal and an advocate of nannyism instead of thoughtfully considering new scientific evidence that may help save people’s lives.
The article is an obviously “pro-mandatory” vaccination piece. If I mistook your comments to be supporting the whole concept of the article I apologies.
You have as much right to your opinion as anyone else but if anyone is supporting “coersive” or “mandatory” vaccinations, then I think they are “nanny staters”.
Last I heard, testing on 9 to 12 yr old girls only began at the end of 2006. (in Japan) Merck reps were pushing this stuff in 2005.