To: rightwingintelligentsia
Sad, but it is true. There seems to be more outrage with the “victims” of Vicks case than OJ’s case.
12 posted on
08/02/2007 5:25:59 AM PDT by
hophead
("Enjoy Every Sandwich")
To: hophead
The victims in the Vick case were innocents. OJ’s victims were not. I am not stating here that they deserved to die and OJ should have killed them, but they were in no way innocents.
27 posted on
08/02/2007 6:12:49 AM PDT by
twonie
(Keep your guns - and stockpile ammo.)
To: hophead
There seems to be more outrage with the “victims” of Vicks case than OJ’s case. "victims"?
48 posted on
08/02/2007 7:11:43 AM PDT by
Fitzcarraldo
(Skip the Moon, go for Mars)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson