That's my whole point--once it's forced in place, the attitude is "Well, I would have voted it down when it came up, BUT since it's HERE now, I want my share!"
Which is precisely what the proponents of Nanny Government want.
Agreed. And my point is where was FR when a President did offer an alternative that would allow younger people to keep some of their own money? AARP was all over the issue. It will be a long, long time if ever a President has the stones to offer something like that again.