Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Terms seen met as U.S.-India nuclear text unveiled
Swissinfo ^ | August 03 2007 | Y.P. Rajesh/Reuters

Posted on 08/03/2007 9:01:37 AM PDT by knighthawk

NEW DELHI (Reuters) - India and the United States unveiled the much-awaited text outlining their landmark civilian nuclear cooperation deal on Friday, and analysts said it appeared to have met New Delhi's key demands.

The deal aims to give India access to U.S. nuclear fuel and equipment, overturning a three-decade ban imposed after New Delhi, which has not signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty, conducted a nuclear test in 1974.

Although the framework deal was approved by the U.S. Congress last December, talks over a bilateral pact, called the 123 agreement after a section of the U.S. Atomic Energy Act, had run into trouble over Indian objections to "new conditions" in it.

It was finalised last month at what were seen as make-or-break talks between top officials of the two sides in Washington and is expected to be formally signed this month.

The once-estranged democracies had agreed that nuclear cooperation would be "on the basis of mutual respect for sovereignty, non-interference in each other's internal affairs ... and with due respect for each other's nuclear programmes", it said.

"This agreement shall remain in force for a period of 40 years," the text said. "It shall continue in force thereafter for additional periods of 10 years each."

The two countries had struggled to sew up the agreement because India had wanted the United States to allow it to reprocess spent nuclear fuel, assure permanent fuel supplies and not penalise India by ending nuclear trade if it conducts another nuclear test.

The text of the agreement showed that the first two demands had largely been met, while there was no direct mention of the consequences of another Indian test.


The pact has to be approved by Congress, while India needs to get clearances from the Nuclear Suppliers Group of nations that govern global civilian nuclear trade and also conclude an agreement to place its civilian reactors under U.N. safeguards.

"The United States will support an Indian effort to develop a strategic reserve of nuclear fuel to guard against any disruption of supply over the lifetime of India's reactors," the text said.

If despite these arrangements fuel supply is disrupted, the two countries would jointly convene a group of friendly supplier countries such as Russia, France and Britain to restore supplies to India, it said.

While both countries would have the right to end the pact with a year's advance notice and demand the return of fuel and equipment transferred, "the two parties recognise that exercising the right of return would have profound implications for their relations", the agreement said.

In what Indian officials said was an indirect reference to a future Indian nuclear test, the pact said the two sides had agreed to take into account whether "circumstances that may lead to termination" resulted from a "changed security environment" or "a response to similar actions by other states".

In other words, if Pakistan or China conducted nuclear tests, the U.S. would take that into account if Indian responded.

Indian officials had last week said they were satisfied with the pact and analysts and lobby groups echoed that on Friday.

"On the face of it, it's all there. It's a very mature deal," said Robinder Sachdev of lobby group U.S. Indian Political Action Committee.

"It covers very clearly the basis for moving ahead. It shows both governments want to engage in a mature and sophisticated manner with each other in the next half a century," he said.

Reuters (IDS)

TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; geopolitics; india; indianukes; nuclear; proliferation

1 posted on 08/03/2007 9:01:39 AM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; Turk2; keri; ...


2 posted on 08/03/2007 9:02:04 AM PDT by knighthawk (We will always remember We will always be proud We will always be prepared so we may always be free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Let’s dust off the Pershings and base them in India...

3 posted on 08/03/2007 9:17:50 AM PDT by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: in hoc signo vinces

Ohhh..I forgot...*sigh* we could if we had any left...all destroyed in 1991 under treaty.

4 posted on 08/03/2007 9:24:24 AM PDT by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson