Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cowboyway

So you are not for holding people responsible for the damage resulting from their negligence?


25 posted on 08/04/2007 10:27:37 PM PDT by TheBattman (I've got TWO QUESTIONS for you....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: TheBattman
So you are not for holding people responsible for the damage resulting from their negligence?

If I run my car into your house, I should pay to repair your house.

If I run my car into a guard rail and am required to pay for the guard rail then the state should reimburse the taxpayers. And my point is, that doesn't happen.

Why don't we require heavy haulers to pay for road damages caused by their big rigs?

Because they're charged heavier taxes in anticipation of the damage.

26 posted on 08/05/2007 4:07:17 PM PDT by cowboyway (My heroes have always been Cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson