To: HAL9000
I do not understand, what is the problem here?
3 posted on
08/05/2007 12:06:25 AM PDT by
jveritas
(God bless our brave troops and President Bush.)
To: jveritas
"I do not understand, what is the problem here?"
Wondering the same thing. Why is this a bid deal?
15 posted on
08/05/2007 12:40:15 AM PDT by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
To: jveritas
I do not understand, what is the problem here? Our telecommunications infrastructure is too slow and unreliable compared to many of the nations we are competing with.
Osama bin Laden has better Internet service in his cave that many Americans can get today.
16 posted on
08/05/2007 12:43:56 AM PDT by
HAL9000
To: jveritas
itto... what’s the problem? so what?
50 posted on
08/05/2007 5:08:26 AM PDT by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . Happiness is a down sleeping bag)
To: jveritas
The simple fact of the matter is that people are not willing to pay for faster broadband and the gov’t is not willing to allow the natural monopoly of a telecom to form. So the telecoms (and cable too) are not willing to dump cheap high speed internet into everyone’s home until they hit a certain economy of scale.
72 posted on
08/05/2007 8:07:50 AM PDT by
Bogey78O
(Don't call them jihadis. Call them irhabis. Tick them off, don't entertain their delusion.)
To: jveritas
>> I do not understand, what is the problem here?
Same question here.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson