1 posted on
08/05/2007 8:24:14 AM PDT by
SmithL
To: SmithL
Hell, Clinton would gain respect in Japan in a room full of rush hour train butt pinchers.
2 posted on
08/05/2007 8:29:46 AM PDT by
Enterprise
(I can't talk about liberals anymore because some of the words will get me sent to rehab.)
To: SmithL
3 posted on
08/05/2007 8:31:05 AM PDT by
SengirV
To: SmithL
Wasn’t Daily Kos FUNDED by the DNC?
The headline is misleading because it sounds like there is some sort of “blogger” consensus about her candidacy. Actually it just represents a sliver of those on the Left spectrum of politics.
5 posted on
08/05/2007 8:41:27 AM PDT by
weegee
(NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
To: SmithL
Hillary the Marxist is too right wing for these people.
Yikes.
6 posted on
08/05/2007 8:53:19 AM PDT by
Jacquerie
(The Clintons, above the law & beneath contempt.)
To: SmithL
7 posted on
08/05/2007 9:11:04 AM PDT by
freekitty
To: SmithL
She received 9 percent of the vote - narrowly nudging "No Freaking Clue" No Freaking Clue? At least they are trying to add some dignity to the proceedings.
And what would they change the other candidate's name (NFC) to? Toby?
10 posted on
08/05/2007 9:15:36 AM PDT by
Bernard
(The Fairness Doctrine should be applied to people who follow the rules to come to America legally)
To: SmithL
"I only wish we had this active and fighting a blogosphere 15 years ago,"Somebody ping The Washington Post, The New York Times, The LA Times, The CNN, The PBS, et al.
What a slap in the face to those loyal left-wing wacko Clinton mouthpieces.
11 posted on
08/05/2007 9:19:40 AM PDT by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
To: SmithL
I wonder how many days in advance this article was written.
13 posted on
08/05/2007 9:39:28 AM PDT by
thegreatmalcolmx
(I came to love white people. At least that is what I was taught in my black history class.)
To: SmithL
Why is the word now that Dems own the Internet? Is it that Conservatives cannot stand to post lies all the time?
14 posted on
08/05/2007 9:39:59 AM PDT by
RightWhale
(It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
To: SmithL
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton faced a convention Saturday of 1,400 politically influential online activists who don't particularly like her. Yet she emerged from the presidential forum here at the Yearly Kos convention with a little more respect - if not love - from the liberal bloggers. Oh please. Theyre gonna vote for her no matter what. And only because she has the "D" after her name. Months ago I read so many posts on liberal blogs and message boards, claiming that if Hillary is the nomineee, they wont vote for her. Of course, all it will take is for the DNC and the liberal media to work them up into such hatred against the Republican nominee (whoever he may be), that they will vote for anybody, including Hillary.
To: SmithL
"I only wish we had this active and fighting a blogosphere 15 years ago," when her husband, Bill, was president, Clinton said. What a crock. She was wanting to shut down the Internet when it was criticizing and scrutinizing Bill.
16 posted on
08/05/2007 12:53:32 PM PDT by
Albion Wilde
( “A nation without borders is not a nation.” —Ronald Reagan)
To: SmithL
She is everywhere I tell you!!!!!....She is in your face!!!!!!.....If you are for her are against her it does not matter as long as she is in the news!!!!!.... Plus or Minus it does not mean a thing to her as long her name is there everyday 24/7/365...!!!!!!!!!!........
17 posted on
08/05/2007 6:15:00 PM PDT by
GitmoSailor
(AZ Cold War Vet===Fairness Doctrine for TV First!!!!!.....I'Am With Fred)
To: SmithL
Bloggers don’t gather.
They sit around in their mothers basements wearing pajamas and typing on dimly lit screens.
I seem to recall that I learned this during the Dan Rather Daze.
18 posted on
08/05/2007 6:47:56 PM PDT by
festus
(I'm a fRedneck and proud of it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson