To: David Isaac
They left in place every Clinton operative, in every sector of the government. I do not view that as being a good thing for the nation. Bush's refusal to pursue the Clintons' traitorous actions is a mystery to me. Some say it was part of his "new tone" in Washington. Yet, he had been around Washington enough to know that what worked with old Democrats in Texas would not work in D.C.
15 posted on
08/06/2007 8:01:26 AM PDT by
Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
To: Mind-numbed Robot
Yet, he had been around Washington enough to know that what worked with old Democrats in Texas would not work in D.C.
And what the did to his father should have warned him but when you are a Compassionate Conservative I guess it clouds your reasoning
20 posted on
08/06/2007 8:54:29 AM PDT by
uncbob
(m first)
To: Mind-numbed Robot
“Bush’s refusal to pursue the Clintons’ traitorous actions is a mystery to me.”
I would say it was much more of a clue than a mystery. If anyone could point out to me how one of our political parties could survive without the cooperation of the other, I would be will to listen and be amazed. The things that have come out of Washington in the last 40 years, would totally eliminate the party that was resonsible, if the other party could, and would, be willing to assign them the blame, AMEN.
27 posted on
08/06/2007 1:59:27 PM PDT by
David Isaac
(Duncan Hunter '08)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson