Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fred Thompson, the Second Coming of Ronald Reagan?
Fox News ^ | 6 Aug 07 | Mark Joesph

Posted on 08/06/2007 6:24:55 PM PDT by gobucks

(snip) Much has been made about whether or not Fred Thompson is the second coming of Ronald Reagan, and while it's clear that he's not, it's also becoming fairly clear that the oddly constructed coalition that Reagan built combining fiscal conservatives, defense hawks, libertarians, Evangelicals and working-class conservative Democrats is about to fall apart unless Thompson can reinvent it.

(snip)

Among those issues, of course, abortion is the major litmus test that Thompson will need to pass to win their support. And fortunately for the candidate, his lobbying on behalf of Planned Parenthood took place 17 years before his presidential run, not unlike Reagan, who 13 years before his own run had signed a therapeautic abortion law as governor of California.

In Reagan's case, evangelical voters accepted his explanation that he had been tricked by liberal legislators who had promised him that the law would allow for abortions only for serious medical conditions, when it in fact opened the way for a "health" exception that was subsequently interpreted broadly in its application.

Similarly, future Thompson voters are likely to accept a mea culpa from the candidate if it's straightforward and doesn't fudge. These are, after all, evangelical Christians for a reason, one of the central tenets of the faith being forgiveness for an act that is repented of and is in the past, preferably the distant past.

With his Evangelical base solidified, Thompson will then be able to secure his more natural constituencies — gun owners, "lunch pail" Democrats, country music fans, star-struck Law & Order viewers, and even elements of the entertainment industry who are unlikely to see him the same way they see other conservative candidates because of his star power.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: fredsaloser; fredthompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-131 next last
To: Fast Ed97

That is a completely ignorant statement.

Fred spent his entire time in the Senate trying to cut taxes, waste, and regulation, trying to increase the efficiency of the government, and trying to bring the government back to the principles of Federalism.


61 posted on 08/06/2007 7:35:03 PM PDT by Politicalmom (Of the potential GOP front runners, FT has one of the better records on immigration.- NumbersUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem

Amen!


62 posted on 08/06/2007 7:37:04 PM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CheyennePress

Gee. I guess they all should have started ten years ago. Oh woe is me! I don’t have a grassroots organization in Iowa!

I submit that there is no need to get into the race two years before the election to win or do well in the Iowa caucus. Iowa, like New Hampshire, where I live, is small. The residents aren’t paying any attention yet. Some time around October we will begin to check out the race. Other than a few Romney ads last Spring, the political season has not started.

I also submit that this election is a bit different. Iowa and New Hampshire have become much less important because of the front loading of other states. The whole thing will be done in two weeks. Florida and South Carolina will tell the story.

Iowa and New Hampshire have little importance. Heck, NH voted for Queeg in 2000. Remember Eugene McCarthy? Gary Hart? Paul Tsongas? Ed Muskie? Henry Cabot Lodge? Harold Stassen? Well, OK, McCarthy didn’t beat LBJ but it was close.

If a candidate announces by the end of October, he or she will be right on schedule. Besides, Fred is getting more press by holding out. He’s already in first or second place and he hasn’t had to listen to that nut, Ron Paul.


63 posted on 08/06/2007 7:44:03 PM PDT by Poser (Willing to fight for oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem
reply to #3

My guess is FDT would be the first to agree with you. Just more pile on by the RG/Hillary lacky press to get all juiced up for a BIG LETDOWN when FDT does not meet these bizarre comparisons to RR....
64 posted on 08/06/2007 7:47:47 PM PDT by Fred (Democrat Party - "The Nadir of Nihilism")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot
Reluctant to announce??

Might be waiting for McCain to drop out.
65 posted on 08/06/2007 7:49:09 PM PDT by Fred (Democrat Party - "The Nadir of Nihilism")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gobucks

Oh geez, I’m so sick of this “Fred is Reagan” stuff. Just because he’s an actor gone into politics does not make him the next Ronald Reagan. Unless he can get elected and end the coming Cold War, he’s not like Reagan at all.


66 posted on 08/06/2007 7:51:16 PM PDT by G8 Diplomat (The more the left mouths off, the more they embarass themselves in the eyes of the sane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem
Not even close.

Dude, nobody said Fred was OK, other than the liberal media who is trying to redefine our candidates for us.

67 posted on 08/06/2007 7:51:30 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot
He didn't ask to be where he is, he was pushed.

What does that say about Thompson having a fire in his gut which is what we need not just for a candiate but for a President, like Reagan, if he's being pushed into this?

68 posted on 08/06/2007 7:52:45 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: gondramB; gobucks
There are two main reasons to call someone the new Ronald Reagan - to build them up more than they deserve or to build them up to tear them down.

It's the MSM for the most part who are comparing Thompson to Reagan and you can bet your bottom dollar that it's to tear him down at a later point in time.

69 posted on 08/06/2007 7:53:10 PM PDT by Doofer (Fred Dalton Thompson For President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot
You'll notice that the ones whining about why Fred isn't in the race aren't going to support him anyway.
70 posted on 08/06/2007 7:53:48 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

And there’s where I disagree with you. Go look at the policy pages of the candidates you’ve named. Romney and Duncan Hunter have spelled out more policy than I’ve seen out of any of the other candidates combined.

Fred Thompson has given a series of soundbytes that really say nothing. Those are the fruits of his campaign to this point.


71 posted on 08/06/2007 7:55:35 PM PDT by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: CheyennePress
Even if Fred Thompson did take the Republican nomination, he’d do so at a disadvantage to the Dim nominee, who would have been building a nationwide network of support for well over a year.

What a bunch of bovine excrement. I expect Fred will give a stirring nomination speech that will rank among the best in political history, and the base will be in a frenzy. Whoever the Dim nominee is, they're going to lose.

My prediction is that Fred will win between 40-45 states.

72 posted on 08/06/2007 7:57:36 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: gobucks

Fox News is in Giuliani’s pocket — I’m not taking much of what they say about the primaries seriously. All of these allusions to Reagan are transparent attempts to make Thompson look bad in comparison. Thompson is his own man, and is an excellent fit for our times.


73 posted on 08/06/2007 7:58:59 PM PDT by ellery (I don't remember a constitutional amendment that gives you the right not to be identified-R.Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CheyennePress
Go look at the policy pages of the candidates you’ve named. Romney and Duncan Hunter have spelled out more policy than I’ve seen out of any of the other candidates combined.

Both of these candidates declared way too early, spent too much money or raised too little, and are still stuck in the polls.

Fred Thompson has given a series of soundbytes that really say nothing. Those are the fruits of his campaign to this point.

So those essays Fred has written on federalism and limited government means nothing to you? Fred has outlined a clear, coherent vision on what America needs to do in the near future. I'm sorry he's not micro-managing and analyzing every little detail like the other guys are.

74 posted on 08/06/2007 8:03:00 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Fred
Might be waiting for McCain to drop out.

McCainiac will still be running when Fred’s grandson is POTUS, and still be gettin’ that single vote every election.

75 posted on 08/06/2007 8:08:57 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Zimbabwe, leftist success story, the envy of Venezuela)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Theresawithanh; jesseam
I cannot say this often enough, or capitalize it large enough, but THERE IS STILL TIME FOR FRED TO ENTER THE RACE!

John Kerry didn't enter the race until September and it didn't stop him from being the Demoncrats nominee if I recall correctly.

76 posted on 08/06/2007 8:09:43 PM PDT by Doofer (Fred Dalton Thompson For President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: SonnyBubba
The worse Republican candidate is better than the best Democrat candidate

Excellent observation, SonnyBubba, and very well said.

77 posted on 08/06/2007 8:11:36 PM PDT by Chena (“If you would win a man to your cause, first convince him that you are his sincere friend”-LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: nonliberal

Nor did Reagan ever do anything about the 1983 bombing that killed 241 American servicemen in Beirut. His great failing.


78 posted on 08/06/2007 8:15:53 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: gobucks

Boy I have a great idea!!!!!....I think the “2012” campaign should start about now!!!!!!!!........


79 posted on 08/06/2007 8:24:11 PM PDT by GitmoSailor (AZ Cold War Vet===Fairness Doctrine for TV First!!!!!.....I'Am With Fred)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Ya noticed that too.

Forget the contractual reasons and the fact that we are way early anyways...

80 posted on 08/06/2007 8:40:28 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (I am not really a Fred basher, I just play one on Free Republic. THOMPSON 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson