Talk about your weird organizations, how about a political party and it’s media & university members who more often than not share the views of the terrorist enemies of our nation.
It’s Romney’s constitutional right to religious freedom the Boston Herals is trying to infringe here. Seems to me we heard less about the religion of the first Moslem Congressman, although I do remember that was heralded. The fact he didn’t want to use the Bible during his swearing in was considered quite cool by the media as I recall.
There are some glaring double standards in this nation today.
A newspaper can't "infringe", the government is the entity that would infringe upon his wierdo religion.
Actually Graham pretty much agrees with my opinion in his offering, so I should offer a retraction of my condemnation.
I’m glad he went that route. Sorry I took him to task based on a misimpression from the headline.
Of course, people are free to vote as they choose. Islam preaches Jihad, the violent kind. We are infidels in their eyes and deserve to die or to live as second class citizens with no rights. They have made war upon us. I think voting for a Muslim is voting for someone who will betray our country when the time is right.
Ann Coulter makes the case that liberalism is a religion. The possible sticking point is the idea of a Godless religion. I gather that there are some (Hinduism? Budhism?). Certainly atheism is a world view, at least. The people that I've known who had the greatest drive to convert are atheists. I think environmentalism rises to the level of a religion for some people. Anyway, liberals do often prefer our enemies to our friends. Voting for liberals strikes me as suicide, be it slow or fast.
Those are the only two religions that cause me problems. Islam because it is murderous and has no allegiance to my country. Liberalism because it is anti-market, and often prefers our enemies to our allies and defenders.