Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Russia's Power on the Decline?
American Thinker ^ | 8-9-07 | Douglas Hanson

Posted on 08/07/2007 4:18:51 AM PDT by Renfield

The drive-by media never ceases to amaze with their inability to notice world events, much less understand the global maneuvers in the War on Terror. Ever since Secretary of Defense Gates told Vladimir Putin to butt out concerning his bid to muck up the US - European Missile Defense Shield, several developments have shown how he has been forced to scramble to maintain at least a minimum level of influence over world events. Putin is an excellent practitioner of the bluff and bluster school of foreign policy, even as he struggles by "putting fingers in the dykes" of his dissolving empire. The trend is not favorable for the ex-KGB agent and current President of the Russian Federation.

Russia vacates the Caucasus

In late 2003 during the a peaceful revolution in the former Soviet Republic of Georgia, known as the "Rose Revolution," the last vestiges of the old Soviet guard were ostensibly ushered out. Despite this, Russia's military forces did not "pack up and leave" the country the next day. On the contrary, Putin embarked on a campaign to obstruct and delay the withdrawal of his troops from Georgia. He was not about to voluntarily give up a strategic chunk of land that allowed lines of commerce to Russia's aspiring nuclear partner, Iran, and smuggling routes for lucrative criminal enterprises.

Only because of Western political pressure and a constant influx of NATO forces and advisors did Russian units gradually depart from the area. Even then, Russian "peacekeepers" have stubbornly held on to the so-called "breakaway" republics of South Ossetia and Abkhazia and several key Soviet-era military installations. Essentially, Putin was thumbing his nose at the international community and was placing the national security of the new democracy in jeopardy.

Thanks to a superbly executed strategic campaign by the US and NATO, the land bridge between Russia and Iran has been sealed, and with the backing of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), Putin has been coerced to withdraw more Russian troop contingents from major Soviet Cold War bases. On June 27th it was announced that the Russian 62nd Military Base in Akhalkalaki is now officially Georgian property. This Soviet-era base was actually established before the Russian Revolution in 1910. Not only was it one of the oldest Soviet-era bases, it was also large. To give you an idea as to the magnitude of this military base, in it's heyday it comprised:

...196 facilities on 12,824 hectares of land, among them seven headquarters, seven barracks, three mess-halls, one officers' house, a hospital, two schools - one of them a music school - one kindergarten, two music clubs and other technical facilities. The loss of thie 62nd Military base is not only symbolic of Russia's demise in power, it is real.

The Breakaway Provinces

This still leaves the situation of Russian troops occupying the contested provinces, particularly Abkhazia. Since Abkhazia's "declaration of independence," it has been under the watchful eye of Russian 'peacekeepers.' Even though Georgian President Saakashvili conducted a decisive campaign last year in the Kodori Gorge area of Abkhazia, Putin will hang on to this area at all costs. Simply put, Putin desperately wants to preserve control over the port of Sokhumi since it is a vital transit point for drug smuggling, a major source of cash for Putin, his fellow nationalists, and their criminal allies.

He is also eager to hold on to the town because its military bases were repositories of nuclear and radiological materials including plutonium, uranium and cesium-137. Other unverified reports say the Sokhumi's munitions depots also had chemical weapons. Besides being a prolific source of cash for Mother Russia, this second motive for Putin's refusal to withdraw from Sokhumi is "personal." Public disclosures as to the lack of security pertaining to nuclear materials, or of major damage to the environment due to lack of internationally accepted storage regimens would further damage Putin's standing in the world, even among his Western apologists.

But time is running out for Putin and his Russian "peacekeepers." We now learn from Georgia's Defense Today (the national security offshoot of the English language weekly, Georgia Today), that Georgia's acceptance into NATO is dependent on its maintaining the traditional territory of the sovereign kingdom including South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Georgian Deputy Defense Minister, Batu Kutelia, emphasized that the NATO Membership Action Plan (MAP) permits no compromise on Georgia's borders. He noted that NATO sees acceptance into the alliance only where,

Georgia's territorial integrity is an issue which will be never questioned and if Georgia is adopted into NATO it will be adopted in its full territorial integrity. That is, the conflict over the two provinces currently under Russian control will not be resolved in Putin's favor.

The Black Sea Fleet needs a new home

Often overlooked in the grand scheme of the world's power plays is Ukraine. The go-soft-on-Putin crowd and other critics of the Administration's Eurasian policies have slammed the Orange Revolution with a fervor normally reserved for GW's successful operations. During the period from late 2004 through January of 2005, Ukraine reformers and nationalists overturned a fraudulent election and swept the Russian-backed President Victor Yanukovich and his pro-Russian party out of an office they had tried to steal. Putin had openly backed the Yanukovich and his pro-Russian party. Now Ukraine is on its way to being accepted into NATO. In keeping with this, US and European personnel have ramped up their Ukrainian military training and assistance projects over the last year; these will likely evolve into long-term advisory operations.

Ukraine has one other critical capability that is virtually unknown in the other newly formed democracies in the region - it has a robust defense industry. Its industrial infrastructure has enabled it to equip other small nations with newly manufactured combat systems of Soviet design. Now veterans of the Red Army in the new democracies can quickly organize and train to achieve NATO operational standards.

Putin's forces have not totally withdrawn from Ukraine either, but the signs are that this will happen sooner rather than later. It was reported this week in Voice of America News that the chief of the Russian Navy, Admiral Vladimir Masorin, is looking to move the Black Sea Fleet from its Ukrainian base in Sevastopol to a "permanent naval base on the Mediterranean Sea;" another acknowledgment of the decline of Russia's power. Recognizing that the Mediterranean is strategically important to Russia, Admiral Masorin will look for an alternative to maintain a military presence in the region. Translation: "we can't have the Russian Navy based in a NATO port; we need to go somewhere in order to salvage our reputation and influence in the Eastern Med."

Clearly, the Black Sea port of Sokhumi is out of the mix. In another example of the curtailment of Russian world power and prestige, Putin must now work to stave off the inevitable return of Abkhazia to the Georgian central government or face continuing pressure from NATO and the US, while simultaneously looking for a new smuggling route for drugs and the transference of WMD materials and technology. He may also need to buy time to clean up hazardous waste sites or risk a public relations and environmental disaster.

The VOA report suggests an alternative for the Russian Navy. It said that Russia was looking to expand an existing naval base in the Syrian port of Tartus in order to homeport the ships of the Black Sea Fleet. Not surprisingly, this was denied by Russian officials. It may be that Putin and his Black Sea Fleet will get a "return trip" to one of the former USSR's Middle East client states, home to Assad's Baathist regime and the starting point of the Sunni "rat line" into Iraq. And if this comes about, it will cement Putin's ties to a terror supporting country.

Let's hope our friends in the MSM, and the rest of the world take notice. All things considered, it's no wonder Vladimir has been in a foul mood lately.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Russia
KEYWORDS: coldwar2; empire; putin; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
I think this assessment might be overly-optimistic, but I hope it is correct.
1 posted on 08/07/2007 4:18:52 AM PDT by Renfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Renfield

it’s a good article.

putin is a thug.


2 posted on 08/07/2007 4:24:48 AM PDT by ken21 (28 yrs + 2 families = banana republic junta. si.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

RE Putin. What would you do if all you had was a KGB education and you faced rebuilding a country that had imploded seven years ago, was found to have had its nukes embezzled, was found to have wrecked its oil-producing wealth, had debased its currency, had become infiltrated by thousands of criminal “families....what COULD you do?


3 posted on 08/07/2007 4:26:04 AM PDT by Rapscallion (Once a conservative Republican; now only a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rapscallion

“what COULD you do?”

Follow the footsteps of the past and sell weapons to third world countries, make false claims on oil reserves, lie to your countrymen and kill anyone who dares to disagree. Did I miss anything?


4 posted on 08/07/2007 4:31:23 AM PDT by poobear (Pure democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what's for dinner. God save the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
In their anger against Russia and aggressive support for Bush administration hard-liners, they are inclined to forget that Putin's Russia is the only Russia they - and the rest of us - have. It's the one that has to be dealt with, whatever it is, or becomes.

W Pfaff - IHT
5 posted on 08/07/2007 4:38:21 AM PDT by JohnA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: poobear

...”labour” camps.


6 posted on 08/07/2007 4:44:42 AM PDT by SolidWood (UN delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

...”labour” camps.

Ahh yes, those stop off grounds PRIOR to death.


7 posted on 08/07/2007 4:47:22 AM PDT by poobear (Pure democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what's for dinner. God save the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: poobear

Here’s this, from Captain’s Quarters: (http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/010882.php)

Georgian officials claim that Russian jets invaded their airspace last night and fired a missile, which turned out to be a dud. The incident appears to be an escalation of Russian hostility towards its former republic and NATO aspirant:

“...Russia has been accused of launching an airstrike in an “act of aggression” against neighbouring Georgia.
Russia, which has a long history of tense relations with the former Soviet state, has denied the claim.

Georgian officials said that two Russian jet fighters violated its airspace and fired a missile which did not explode.

A Georgian government spokesman said that the intrusion took place on Monday night when the aircraft entered Georgia’s airspace over the northeastern Gori region and fired a missile which fell near the village of Tsitelubani, around 40 miles west of the capital, Tbilisi....”

This puts a rather interesting twist on Georgia’s relationship with NATO. They have made no secret about their desire for membership, but NATO has hesitated to provoke Russia with an offer. Russia has made clear that they would see NATO membership for either Ukraine or Georgia as a provocation, having drawn a diplomatic line in the sand last month on that issue.

However, Georgian independence should matter to the West, and an attack on Georgia should not go unanswered by NATO. The last thing we need in the Caucasus is another flashpoint for border wars. Violating Georgian air space and firing a missile constitutes two acts of war, especially the latter, and Georgia has to give some response to that provocation. Likely that will be a diplomatic response. Georgia doesn’t have the resources to make good on a military attack, and it would probably give Vladimir Putin an excuse to invade Georgia.

Do you suppose Putin is embarrassed over the dud? Had the missile exploded, it might have been harder to prove that the attack came from Russia. If Georgia has the missile intact, though, it will show that Russia attacked Georgia, and that Russian armament leaves a lot to be desired.

Russia under Vladimir Putin seems intent on remaking its empire through any means necessary. If we value Georgian independence as a check on Russian imperial ambitions, and we should, we had better make clear to Putin that we find this unacceptable, and offer a few consequences of our own. That NATO membership application could be dusted off at any time.

(Quoted text taken from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/08/07/wgeorgia107.xml )


8 posted on 08/07/2007 4:54:52 AM PDT by Renfield (How come there aren't any football teams with pink uniforms?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: poobear

Did I miss anything?

claim to be a Christian


9 posted on 08/07/2007 4:59:02 AM PDT by wildcatf4f3 (Hey, this aint like the 1960s, this is like the 1860s.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
Weren’t we planning on rebuilding a long range missile defense in Georgia?
10 posted on 08/07/2007 5:03:47 AM PDT by poobear (Pure democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what's for dinner. God save the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: poobear

You pretty much summed it up. Putin had to analyze his strengths and put an emphesis there. He has almost no manufacturing capability except weapons. He really has no choice but to make weapons and hope he can sell them.

That is make weapons, deliver them and then receive hard currency cash. His predecessors did all that except collect the cash.

I admire the man simply because he is carrying an extremely heavy burden of a nearly dysfunctional ans dying population with an economy that by world standrds is fourth rate.
waking up to all that is probably very disconserting.


11 posted on 08/07/2007 5:19:54 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Happiness is a down sleeping bag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

No. Oil is power. And they’ve got lots of it.

Like I’ve said many times... He who has the last barrel of oil will rule the world.


12 posted on 08/07/2007 5:27:11 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

While former Warsaw Pact members and Soviet republics strive desperately to join the West, Russia continues a tradtion of existing on the margin of Europe, seeking none of its benefits from the intellectual to the economic. Thus, unlike the Ukraine which is rushing pell-mell into the 21st century, Russia is stuck in the 20th and remains truly an Asian despotism. One wonders how long the Russian core of 100 million people will be able to hold on to its periphery (Siberia, the Caucasus).


13 posted on 08/07/2007 5:46:31 AM PDT by Melchior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

I will give credit to the KGB Putin, he hates Muslim terrorists. Guess they disagree a bit too much with him.


14 posted on 08/07/2007 5:51:12 AM PDT by poobear (Pure democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what's for dinner. God save the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: poobear

“...I will give credit to the KGB Putin, he hates Muslim terrorists. Guess they disagree a bit too much with him....”

I have believed for a long time that Putin uses Muslim fanatics as proxies against us. He doesn’t hate them at all, he sees them as his allies (or, at least, useful idiots) in his struggle against the U.S.

Remember, the PLO was entirely a creation of the KGB.


15 posted on 08/07/2007 5:56:15 AM PDT by Renfield (How come there aren't any football teams with pink uniforms?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Oil is power? Yaaa, I guess that’s why Saudi Arabia is the world’s
leading superpower.

No, he who has the last barrel of oil will have the last barrel of
oil. Nothing more. And you can bet that he who has the last
bareel of oil will not be the bearer of the next energy technology.

The article actually speaks some truth. Refer to US “diplomatic”
activity in the former southern repubs of the former USSR during
the 90s. Alos refer to an op-ed by James Pinkerton from June 2005
I belivee re the US Arc of Power. US military overseas re-alignmnts
scheduled to begin next yr bear out what the article says.

US bases throughout Central Asia (all in former USSR repubs) and
bases to be hosted by E European nations. Sounds like the Berlin
Wall is shifting about 900mi east. And coming around the southern
soft white underbelly of the fomrer ‘empire”. This one designed
to keep Putin at home w/ the promise of putting his landmass at
risk.

MV


16 posted on 08/07/2007 6:27:30 AM PDT by madvlad ((Born in the south, raised around the globe and STILL republican))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: poobear
Did I miss anything?

Yes, pass a flat tax. Prosecute robber barons. Steadily improve the economy. Promote Christianity. Develop programs to increase the birth rate. Monitor and check the MSM out to destroy its' host sovereignty.

Do a good job and have a 60%+ approval rating from the people. Don't fool yourself, Russia is steadily moving forward.

Why so many FRs think we need Russia and Mexico as enemies, instead of focusing on the Islamists threat is beyond me.

17 posted on 08/07/2007 6:27:46 AM PDT by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
I have believed for a long time that Putin uses Muslim fanatics as proxies against us.

We showed him how. First in Afghanistan, then in Bosnia. What else would you expect?

18 posted on 08/07/2007 6:33:52 AM PDT by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: duckln; Renfield

Things that make you hmmmmm....


19 posted on 08/07/2007 6:53:26 AM PDT by poobear (Pure democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what's for dinner. God save the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: madvlad

If it weren’t for oil, Saudi Arabia would be nothing but a big sandbox.


20 posted on 08/07/2007 7:08:26 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson